Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Private struct fields are in the rustdoc search index #15490

Closed
tomjakubowski opened this issue Jul 6, 2014 · 0 comments · Fixed by #16016
Closed

Private struct fields are in the rustdoc search index #15490

tomjakubowski opened this issue Jul 6, 2014 · 0 comments · Fixed by #16016
Labels
T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@tomjakubowski
Copy link
Contributor

For example, if you search for search_index: http://static.rust-lang.org/doc/master/std/index.html?search=search_index

The private search_index field of rustdoc::html::render::Cache is shown.

tomjakubowski added a commit to tomjakubowski/rust that referenced this issue Jul 26, 2014
Previously, private and `#[doc(hidden)]` struct fields appeared in the
search index despite being hidden from the struct's documentation.

Fix rust-lang#15490
bors added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 27, 2014
…ichton

Previously, private and `#[doc(hidden)]` struct fields appeared in the
search index despite being hidden from the struct's documentation.

Fix #15490
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2023
…kril

fix help text for rust-analyzer.check.invocation{Strategy,Location}

I highly doubt that `check.invocationLocation` only has an effect if `cargo.buildScripts.overrideCommand` is set -- looks like a copy-paste mistake from `buildScripts.invocationLocation` to me.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants