rustdoc: Keep hidden struct fields out of search #16016
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Previously, private and `#[doc(hidden)]` struct fields appeared in the search index despite being hidden from the struct's documentation. Fix rust-lang#15490
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2014
…ichton Previously, private and `#[doc(hidden)]` struct fields appeared in the search index despite being hidden from the struct's documentation. Fix #15490
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2023
…cola fix: Insert fn call parens only if the parens inserted around field name Fixes rust-lang#16014. Sorry I missed it in previous PR. I've added a test as level to prevent regressions again. Give any suggestions to improve the test if anything.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, private and
#[doc(hidden)]struct fields appeared in thesearch index despite being hidden from the struct's documentation.
Fix #15490