Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tracking issue for while let #17687

Closed
aturon opened this issue Oct 1, 2014 · 0 comments · Fixed by #17733
Closed

Tracking issue for while let #17687

aturon opened this issue Oct 1, 2014 · 0 comments · Fixed by #17733
Labels
B-RFC-approved Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented.

Comments

@aturon
Copy link
Member

aturon commented Oct 1, 2014

Implement while let behind a feature gate.

RFC PR
Meeting minutes
@aturon aturon added the B-RFC-approved Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented. label Oct 1, 2014
@aturon aturon mentioned this issue Oct 1, 2014
Merged
@jgallagher jgallagher mentioned this issue Oct 3, 2014
Merged
jgallagher pushed a commit to jgallagher/rust that referenced this issue Oct 11, 2014
@hydhknn
Add while let to the reference
0d6dafa 
Closes rust-lang#17687
bors added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2014
@bors
auto merge of #17733 : jgallagher/rust/while-let, r=alexcrichton
c7e0724 
This is *heavily* based on `if let` (#17634) by @jakub- and @kballard

This should close #17687
dlrobertson pushed a commit to dlrobertson/rust that referenced this issue Nov 29, 2018
@hydhknn @Manishearth
Add while let to the reference
29d4145 
Closes rust-lang#17687
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
B-RFC-approved Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Add support for while let jgallagher/rust
1 participant
@aturon