-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rustdoc should never silence lints from the rustdoc
lint group
#78786
Comments
jyn514
added
C-cleanup
Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup.
A-lint
Area: Lints (warnings about flaws in source code) such as unused_mut.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Nov 5, 2020
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this issue
Mar 2, 2021
Make rustdoc lints a tool lint instead of built-in - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` (and similar for other rustdoc lints; I don't expect any others to be used frequently, though). - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests - Move lint machinery into a separate file - Add `declare_rustdoc_lint!` macro Unblocks rust-lang#80300, rust-lang#79816, rust-lang#80965. Makes the strangeness in rust-lang#77364 more apparent to the end user (note that `missing_docs` is *not* moved to rustdoc in this PR). Closes rust-lang#78786. ## Current status This is blocked on rust-lang#82620 (see rust-lang#80527 (comment))
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this issue
Mar 2, 2021
Make rustdoc lints a tool lint instead of built-in - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` (and similar for other rustdoc lints; I don't expect any others to be used frequently, though). - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests - Move lint machinery into a separate file - Add `declare_rustdoc_lint!` macro Unblocks rust-lang#80300, rust-lang#79816, rust-lang#80965. Makes the strangeness in rust-lang#77364 more apparent to the end user (note that `missing_docs` is *not* moved to rustdoc in this PR). Closes rust-lang#78786. ## Current status This is blocked on rust-lang#82620 (see rust-lang#80527 (comment))
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this issue
Mar 3, 2021
Make rustdoc lints a tool lint instead of built-in - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` (and similar for other rustdoc lints; I don't expect any others to be used frequently, though). - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests - Move lint machinery into a separate file - Add `declare_rustdoc_lint!` macro Unblocks rust-lang#80300, rust-lang#79816, rust-lang#80965. Makes the strangeness in rust-lang#77364 more apparent to the end user (note that `missing_docs` is *not* moved to rustdoc in this PR). Closes rust-lang#78786. ## Current status This is blocked on rust-lang#82620 (see rust-lang#80527 (comment))
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this issue
Mar 4, 2021
Make rustdoc lints a tool lint instead of built-in - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` (and similar for other rustdoc lints; I don't expect any others to be used frequently, though). - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests - Move lint machinery into a separate file - Add `declare_rustdoc_lint!` macro Unblocks rust-lang#80300, rust-lang#79816, rust-lang#80965. Makes the strangeness in rust-lang#77364 more apparent to the end user (note that `missing_docs` is *not* moved to rustdoc in this PR). Closes rust-lang#78786. ## Current status This is blocked on rust-lang#82620 (see rust-lang#80527 (comment))
JohnTitor
added a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this issue
Mar 4, 2021
Make rustdoc lints a tool lint instead of built-in - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` (and similar for other rustdoc lints; I don't expect any others to be used frequently, though). - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests - Move lint machinery into a separate file - Add `declare_rustdoc_lint!` macro Unblocks rust-lang#80300, rust-lang#79816, rust-lang#80965. Makes the strangeness in rust-lang#77364 more apparent to the end user (note that `missing_docs` is *not* moved to rustdoc in this PR). Closes rust-lang#78786. ## Current status This is blocked on rust-lang#82620 (see rust-lang#80527 (comment))
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I think the right fix here is to never silence lints from the
rustdoc
lint group, then there wouldn't be so many places to add new lints.Originally posted by @jyn514 in #78114 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: