Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Slightly tweak comments wrt lint_overflowing_range_endpoint #102602

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2022

Conversation

WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

From the review: #101986 (comment)

It seemed that the lint was not emitted when the if check failed, but actually this happens already in a special case and the lint is emitted outside of this function, if this function doesn't. I've cleared up the code/comments a bit, so it's more obvious :)

r? @estebank

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Oct 2, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 2, 2022
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 22, 2022

📌 Commit 64e7fd9 has been approved by estebank

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 22, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2022
Slightly tweak comments wrt `lint_overflowing_range_endpoint`

From the review: rust-lang#101986 (comment)

It _seemed_ that the lint was not emitted when the `if` check failed, but _actually_ this happens already in a special case and the lint is emitted outside of this function, if this function doesn't. I've cleared up the code/comments a bit, so it's more obvious :)

r? `@estebank`
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2022
Slightly tweak comments wrt `lint_overflowing_range_endpoint`

From the review: rust-lang#101986 (comment)

It _seemed_ that the lint was not emitted when the `if` check failed, but _actually_ this happens already in a special case and the lint is emitted outside of this function, if this function doesn't. I've cleared up the code/comments a bit, so it's more obvious :)

r? ``@estebank``
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2022
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#102602 (Slightly tweak comments wrt `lint_overflowing_range_endpoint`)
 - rust-lang#103190 (rustdoc: render bounds of cross-crate GAT params)
 - rust-lang#103224 (Allow semicolon after closure within parentheses in macros)
 - rust-lang#103280 ((rust-lang#102929) Implement `String::leak` (attempt 2))
 - rust-lang#103329 (Add a forgotten check for NonNull::new_unchecked's precondition)
 - rust-lang#103346 (Adjust argument type for mutable with_metadata_of (rust-lang#75091))
 - rust-lang#103360 (Reduce false positives in msys2 detection)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 16c3b64 into rust-lang:master Oct 22, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Oct 22, 2022
@WaffleLapkin WaffleLapkin deleted the linty_action branch October 23, 2022 06:17
@WaffleLapkin WaffleLapkin restored the linty_action branch November 16, 2022 09:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants