Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reduce span of let else irrefutable_let_patterns warning #103749

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2022

Conversation

est31
Copy link
Member

@est31 est31 commented Oct 30, 2022

Huge spans aren't good for IDE users as they underline constructs that are possibly multiline.

Similar PR to #90761 which did the same for the unused_macros lint.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 30, 2022

r? @eholk

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 30, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Huge spans aren't good for IDE users as they underline constructs that
are possibly multiline.
@est31 est31 force-pushed the reduce_irrefutable_let_else_span branch from 4e17b29 to 7b55d17 Compare October 30, 2022 04:05
@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 31, 2022

📌 Commit 7b55d17 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 31, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2022
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#103007 (Add better python discovery)
 - rust-lang#103674 (Update note about unstable split-debuginfo flag.)
 - rust-lang#103692 (Add `walk_generic_arg`)
 - rust-lang#103749 (Reduce span of let else irrefutable_let_patterns warning)
 - rust-lang#103772 (better error for `rustc_strict_coherence` misuse)
 - rust-lang#103788 (Fix ICE in checking transmutability of NaughtyLenArray)
 - rust-lang#103793 (rustdoc: add margins to all impl-item toggles, not just methods)
 - rust-lang#103798 (interpret: move type_name implementation to an interpreter-independent helper file)
 - rust-lang#103799 (Remove generation of tuple struct fields in the search index)
 - rust-lang#103805 (Enable RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP for a few steps)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 2a6a8f4 into rust-lang:master Nov 1, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Nov 1, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang/rust-clippy that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2022
Shrink `missing_{safety,errors,panics}_doc` spans

Shrink the spans of `clippy::missing_*_doc` to match `missing_docs` and don't cover the entire item anymore. This helps readability in IDEs by not coloring the entire screen yellow, similar to rust-lang/rust#103749 and rust-lang/rust#90761.

before:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/26522220/199483288-af0cf0c2-a9e4-47a8-81e3-50ccf380d939.png)

after:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/26522220/199483366-445e5ddd-9f71-4de1-85be-43461c9b7d5d.png)

changelog: [`missing_safety_doc`], [`missing_error_doc`], [`missing_panics_doc`]: These lints no longer span the entire item.
compiler-errors added a commit to compiler-errors/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2023
…ide, r=wesleywiser

Reduce spans for `unsafe impl` errors

Because huge spans aren't great for IDEs.

Prior art: rust-lang#103749
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants