Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove iter::Empty hack #103945

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 28, 2022
Merged

Remove iter::Empty hack #103945

merged 1 commit into from Dec 28, 2022

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Nov 3, 2022

iter::Empty uses a newtype to work around #![feature(const_fn_fn_ptr_basics)], which has been stable since 1.61.0.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 3, 2022

r? @joshtriplett

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 3, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 3, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

compiler-errors commented Dec 27, 2022

Looks good.

r? @compiler-errors @bors r+

cc #92630 which added this hack

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 27, 2022

📌 Commit b473bc9 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 27, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2022
…fee1-dead

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#94145 (Test leaking of BinaryHeap Drain iterators)
 - rust-lang#103945 (Remove `iter::Empty` hack)
 - rust-lang#104024 (Fix `unused_must_use` warning for `Box::from_raw`)
 - rust-lang#104708 (Fix backoff doc to match implementation)
 - rust-lang#105347 (Account for `match` expr in single line)
 - rust-lang#105484 (Implement allow-by-default `multiple_supertrait_upcastable` lint)
 - rust-lang#106184 (Fix `core::any` docs)
 - rust-lang#106201 (Emit fewer errors on invalid `#[repr(transparent)]` on `enum`)
 - rust-lang#106205 (Remove some totally duplicated files in `rustc_infer`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 28, 2022

⌛ Testing commit b473bc9 with merge 6a20f7d...

@bors bors merged commit d1193ad into rust-lang:master Dec 28, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Dec 28, 2022
@ghost ghost deleted the remove-iter-empty-hack branch December 30, 2022 21:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants