rustdoc: use checkbox instead of switch for settings toggles #104267
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The switch is designed to give the application a "physical" feel, but nothing else in here really followed through. They didn't support the "flick" gesture that real iOS switches support, and the radio buttons that were also used in Rustdoc Settings were a more "classic" form element anyway. Also, while "switches" are the exclusive toggle design on iOS (since [Apple HIG] reserves checkboxes for Mac only), the [Google Material] guidelines say that lists of switches are bad, and you should just use check boxes. [Apple HIG]: https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guidelines/components/selection-and-input/toggles [Google Material]: https://m3.material.io/components/checkbox/guidelines#6902f23d-ceba-4b19-ae3b-b78b9b01d185
|
(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS themes. Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS. cc @GuillaumeGomez, @Folyd, @jsha A change occurred in the Ayu theme. cc @Cldfire |
|
Thanks for this! Can you add a GUI test to check the color of the border (hover, no hover) and the color of the background (selected, not selected) please? |
|
@GuillaumeGomez Okay, that's done. |
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
Nov 11, 2022
|
Thanks! @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2022
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#102049 (Add the `#[derive_const]` attribute) - rust-lang#103970 (Unhide unknown spans) - rust-lang#104206 (Remove `save_and_restore_in_snapshot_flag`, use `ObligationCtxt` more) - rust-lang#104214 (Emit error in `collecting_trait_impl_trait_tys` on mismatched signatures) - rust-lang#104267 (rustdoc: use checkbox instead of switch for settings toggles) - rust-lang#104302 (Update cargo) - rust-lang#104303 (UI tests can be assigned to T-compiler) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Preview: http://notriddle.com/notriddle-rustdoc-demos/checkbox/test_dingus/index.html
Before
After
Description
The switch ("slider") is designed to give the application a "physical" feel, but nothing else in here really followed through. They didn't support the "flick" gesture that real iOS switches support, and the radio buttons that were also used in Rustdoc Settings were a more "classic" form element anyway.
Also, while switches are the exclusive toggle design on iOS (since Apple HIG reserves checkboxes for Mac only), the Google Material guidelines say that lists of switches are bad, and you should just use check boxes.