Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document that Vec::from_raw_parts[_in] must be given a pointer from the correct allocator. #106584

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2023

Conversation

kpreid
Copy link
Contributor

@kpreid kpreid commented Jan 8, 2023

Currently, the documentation of Vec::from_raw_parts and Vec::from_raw_parts_in says nothing about what allocator the pointer must come from. This PR adds that missing information explicitly.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 8, 2023

r? @joshtriplett

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 8, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 8, 2023

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Looks good, thank you! @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 8, 2023

📌 Commit 288e89b has been approved by JohnTitor

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 8, 2023
compiler-errors added a commit to compiler-errors/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2023
Document that `Vec::from_raw_parts[_in]` must be given a pointer from the correct allocator.

Currently, the documentation of `Vec::from_raw_parts` and `Vec::from_raw_parts_in` says nothing about what allocator the pointer must come from. This PR adds that missing information explicitly.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2023
…mpiler-errors

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#104163 (Don't derive Debug for `OnceWith` & `RepeatWith`)
 - rust-lang#106131 (Mention "signature" rather than "fn pointer" when impl/trait methods are incompatible)
 - rust-lang#106363 (Structured suggestion for `&mut dyn Iterator` when possible)
 - rust-lang#106497 (Suggest using clone when we have &T and T implemented Clone)
 - rust-lang#106584 (Document that `Vec::from_raw_parts[_in]` must be given a pointer from the correct allocator.)
 - rust-lang#106600 (Suppress type errors that come from private fields)
 - rust-lang#106602 (Add goml scripts to tidy checks)
 - rust-lang#106606 (Do not emit structured suggestion for turbofish with wrong span)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 70f1566 into rust-lang:master Jan 9, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Jan 9, 2023
@kpreid kpreid deleted the vec-allocator branch August 29, 2023 19:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants