-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Descriptive error when users try to combine RPITIT/AFIT with specialization #108551
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @Nilstrieb (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Feb 28, 2023
r? types |
compiler-errors
commented
Feb 28, 2023
@@ -18,6 +18,14 @@ LL | fn bar(&self) -> impl Sized; | |||
= note: expected signature `fn(&U) -> impl Sized` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This fails to be replaced by the other message because we're not actually even assembling a ProjectionCandidate::ImplTraitInTrait
here. Oh well, not that big of a deal.
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Feb 28, 2023
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2023
…=oli-obk Descriptive error when users try to combine RPITIT/AFIT with specialization Previously we failed with some esoteric error like: ``` error[E0053]: method `foo` has an incompatible type for trait --> $DIR/dont-project-to-specializable-projection.rs:14:35 | LL | default async fn foo(_: T) -> &'static str { | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected associated type, found future | note: type in trait --> $DIR/dont-project-to-specializable-projection.rs:10:27 | LL | async fn foo(_: T) -> &'static str; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ = note: expected signature `fn(_) -> impl Future<Output = &'static str>` found signature `fn(_) -> impl Future<Output = &'static str>` ``` Now we error like: ``` error: async associated function in trait cannot be specialized --> $DIR/dont-project-to-specializable-projection.rs:14:5 | LL | default async fn foo(_: T) -> &'static str { | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: specialization behaves in inconsistent and surprising ways with `#![feature(async_fn_in_trait)]`, and for now is disallowed ```
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2023
…=oli-obk Descriptive error when users try to combine RPITIT/AFIT with specialization Previously we failed with some esoteric error like: ``` error[E0053]: method `foo` has an incompatible type for trait --> $DIR/dont-project-to-specializable-projection.rs:14:35 | LL | default async fn foo(_: T) -> &'static str { | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected associated type, found future | note: type in trait --> $DIR/dont-project-to-specializable-projection.rs:10:27 | LL | async fn foo(_: T) -> &'static str; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ = note: expected signature `fn(_) -> impl Future<Output = &'static str>` found signature `fn(_) -> impl Future<Output = &'static str>` ``` Now we error like: ``` error: async associated function in trait cannot be specialized --> $DIR/dont-project-to-specializable-projection.rs:14:5 | LL | default async fn foo(_: T) -> &'static str { | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: specialization behaves in inconsistent and surprising ways with `#![feature(async_fn_in_trait)]`, and for now is disallowed ```
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#108297 (Exit when there are unmatched delims to avoid noisy diagnostics) - rust-lang#108531 (rustdoc: Show that repeated expression arrays can be made with constant values) - rust-lang#108536 (Update books) - rust-lang#108550 (Remove the `capture_disjoint_fields` feature) - rust-lang#108551 (Descriptive error when users try to combine RPITIT/AFIT with specialization) - rust-lang#108554 (Only look for param in item's generics if it actually comes from generics) - rust-lang#108555 (Fix a race in the query system) - rust-lang#108558 (add missing feature in core/tests) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously we failed with some esoteric error like:
Now we error like: