Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add missing feature in core/tests #108558

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2023
Merged

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

#104265 introduced the ip_in_core feature. For some reason core tests seem to still build without that feature -- no idea how that is possible. Might be related to #15702? I was under the impression that pub use with different stability doesn't actually work. That's why intrinsics::transmute is stable, for example.

Either way, core tests fail to build in miri-test-libstd, and adding the feature fixes that.

r? @thomcc

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 28, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 28, 2023

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@thomcc
Copy link
Member

thomcc commented Feb 28, 2023

The way core tests work is really cursed, so it's not unthinkable that there's weird stuff that gets through without needing something like this. Seems worth investigating, though...

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 28, 2023

📌 Commit 229aef1 has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 28, 2023
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2023
add missing feature in core/tests

rust-lang#104265 introduced the `ip_in_core` feature. For some reason core tests seem to still build without that feature -- no idea how that is possible. Might be related to rust-lang#15702? I was under the impression that `pub use` with different stability doesn't actually work. That's why `intrinsics::transmute` is stable, for example.

Either way, core tests fail to build in miri-test-libstd, and adding the feature fixes that.

r? `@thomcc`
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2023
add missing feature in core/tests

rust-lang#104265 introduced the `ip_in_core` feature. For some reason core tests seem to still build without that feature -- no idea how that is possible. Might be related to rust-lang#15702? I was under the impression that `pub use` with different stability doesn't actually work. That's why `intrinsics::transmute` is stable, for example.

Either way, core tests fail to build in miri-test-libstd, and adding the feature fixes that.

r? ``@thomcc``
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#108297 (Exit when there are unmatched delims to avoid noisy diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#108531 (rustdoc: Show that repeated expression arrays can be made with constant values)
 - rust-lang#108536 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#108550 (Remove the `capture_disjoint_fields` feature)
 - rust-lang#108551 (Descriptive error when users try to combine RPITIT/AFIT with specialization)
 - rust-lang#108554 (Only look for param in item's generics if it actually comes from generics)
 - rust-lang#108555 (Fix a race in the query system)
 - rust-lang#108558 (add missing feature in core/tests)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 3abc41a into rust-lang:master Mar 1, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Mar 1, 2023
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the core-tests branch March 20, 2023 18:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants