Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

new solver cleanup + implement coherence #109447

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 23, 2023
Merged

new solver cleanup + implement coherence #109447

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 23, 2023

Conversation

lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr commented Mar 21, 2023

the cleanup:

  • change Certainty::unify_and to consider ambig + overflow to be ambig
  • rename trait_candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of to candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of
  • remove outdated fixme

For coherence I mostly just add an ambiguous candidate if the current trait ref is unknowable. I am doing the same for reservation impl where I also just add an ambiguous candidate.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 21, 2023

r? @compiler-errors

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) labels Mar 21, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 21, 2023

Some changes occurred to the core trait solver

cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 21, 2023

📌 Commit f86b035 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 21, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2023
new solver cleanup + implement coherence

the cleanup:
- change `Certainty::unify_and` to consider ambig + overflow to be ambig
- rename `trait_candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of` to `candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of`
- remove outdated fixme

For coherence I mostly just add an ambiguous candidate if the current trait ref is unknowable. I am doing the same for reservation impl where I also just add an ambiguous candidate.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#108954 (rustdoc: handle generics better when matching notable traits)
 - rust-lang#109203 (refactor/feat: refactor identifier parsing a bit)
 - rust-lang#109213 (Eagerly intern and check CrateNum/StableCrateId collisions)
 - rust-lang#109358 (rustc: Remove unused `Session` argument from some attribute functions)
 - rust-lang#109359 (Update stdarch)
 - rust-lang#109378 (Remove Ty::is_region_ptr)
 - rust-lang#109423 (Use region-erased self type during IAT selection)
 - rust-lang#109447 (new solver cleanup + implement coherence)
 - rust-lang#109501 (make link clickable)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 28b9354 into rust-lang:master Mar 23, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Mar 23, 2023
@lcnr lcnr deleted the coherence branch March 23, 2023 09:41
@lcnr lcnr mentioned this pull request Mar 29, 2023
11 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants