-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 9 pull requests #109465
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 9 pull requests #109465
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- check compiler stage before forcing for stage2. - check if download_rustc is not set before forcing for stage1. Signed-off-by: ozkanonur <work@onurozkan.dev>
After llvm/llvm-project@0d4a709 LLVM now doesn't generate references to panic_cannot_unwind: @nikic: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/187780-t-compiler.2Fwg-llvm/topic/a.20couple.20codegen.20test.20failures.20after.20llvm.200d4a709bb876824a/near/342664944 >Okay, so LLVM now realizes that double panic is not possible, so that's fine.
When running `x.py test` on a downloaded source distribution (e.g. https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rustc-<version>-src.tar.gz), the crates in the vendor directory contain a number of executable files that cause the tidy test to fail with the following message: tidy error: binary checked into source: <path> I see 26 such errors with the 1.68.0 source distribution. A few of these are .rs source files with incorrect executable permission, but most are scripts that are correctly marked executable.
…bilee Support AIX-style archive type Reading facility of AIX big archive has been supported by `object` since 0.30.0. Writing facility of AIX big archive has already been supported by `ar_archive_writer`, but we need to bump the version to support the new archive type enum.
…ce, r=eholk move Option::as_slice to intrinsic ``@scottmcm`` suggested on rust-lang#109095 I use a direct approach of unpacking the operation in MIR lowering, so here's the implementation. cc ``@nikic`` as this should hopefully unblock rust-lang#107224 (though perhaps other changes to the prior implementation, which I left for bootstrapping, are needed).
…=Nilstrieb refactor/feat: refactor identifier parsing a bit \+ error recovery for `expected_ident_found` Prior art: rust-lang#108854
refactor `fn bootstrap::builder::Builder::compiler_for` logic - check compiler stage before forcing for stage2. - check if download_rustc is not set before forcing for stage1. resolves rust-lang#109286
adapt tests/codegen/vec-shrink-panik for LLVM 17 After llvm/llvm-project@0d4a709 LLVM now doesn't generate references to panic_cannot_unwind: https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/rust-llvm-integrate-prototype/builds/17978#0186ff55-ca6f-4bc5-b1ec-2622c77d0ed5/744-746 Adapted as suggested by ```@nikic``` on Zulip: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/187780-t-compiler.2Fwg-llvm/topic/a.20couple.20codegen.20test.20failures.20after.20llvm.200d4a709bb876824a/near/342664944 >Okay, so LLVM now realizes that double panic is not possible, so that's fine.
…riddle rustdoc: Add GUI test for "Auto-hide item contents for large items" setting Part of rust-lang#66181. The `browser-ui-test` version update is because there wasn't `null` check for attributes so I added it (PR is [here](GuillaumeGomez/browser-UI-test#440)). r? `@notriddle`
…-in-self-ty, r=compiler-errors Use region-erased self type during IAT selection Split off from rust-lang#109410 as discussed. Fixes rust-lang#109299. Re UI test: I use a reproducer of rust-lang#109299 that contains a name resolution error instead of reproducer [`regionck-2.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/fc7ed4af165c27ab5914b93251194f826920cc65/tests/ui/associated-inherent-types/regionck-2.rs) (as found in the `AliasKind::Inherent` PR) since it would (incorrectly) pass typeck in this PR due to the lack of regionck and I'd rather not make *that* a regression test (with or without `known-bug`). `@rustbot` label F-inherent_associated_types r? `@compiler-errors`
new solver cleanup + implement coherence the cleanup: - change `Certainty::unify_and` to consider ambig + overflow to be ambig - rename `trait_candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of` to `candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of` - remove outdated fixme For coherence I mostly just add an ambiguous candidate if the current trait ref is unknowable. I am doing the same for reservation impl where I also just add an ambiguous candidate.
Ignore the vendor directory for tidy tests. When running `x.py test` on a downloaded source distribution (e.g. https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rustc-<version>-src.tar.gz), the crates in the vendor directory contain a number of executable files that cause the tidy test to fail with the following message: tidy error: binary checked into source: <path> I see 26 such errors with the 1.68.0 source distribution. A few of these are .rs source files with incorrect executable permission, but most are scripts that are correctly marked executable.
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-infra
Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Mar 21, 2023
rustbot
added
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
WG-trait-system-refactor
The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Mar 21, 2023
@bors r+ rollup=never p=9 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 21, 2023
⌛ Testing commit e3f31bc with merge 5cb317d1df90fcc7b750e761174bc210532d1a40... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Mar 22, 2023
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
@bors retry |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 22, 2023
⌛ Testing commit e3f31bc with merge c7a0d959dff7e03fbfe7d9a4631f9c48135a8fa7... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Mar 22, 2023
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-bootstrap
Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-infra
Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
WG-trait-system-refactor
The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
fn bootstrap::builder::Builder::compiler_for
logic #109295 (refactorfn bootstrap::builder::Builder::compiler_for
logic)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup