docs: publish nightly doc for rustfix

[weihanglo]

rustfix has migrated into rust-lang/cargo in rust-lang/cargo#13005. We now can publish nightly doc for it.

[rustbot]

r? @albertlarsan68

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[albertlarsan68]

LGTM, just one question

[albertlarsan68]

Why remove this?

[weihanglo]

This is more like an integration test not intended to have a public facing doc at this moment.

Thanks for the review :)

[weihanglo]

@rustbot ready

[albertlarsan68]

Thanks for the PR!
@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 7232101 has been approved by albertlarsan68

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 7232101 with merge 6c470a5...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: albertlarsan68
Pushing 6c470a5 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (6c470a5): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.6%	[0.3%, 2.8%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.6%	[0.3%, 2.8%]	2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.8%	[0.6%, 0.9%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.4%	[2.2%, 2.7%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.8%	[-1.8%, -0.5%]	5
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.5%	[-3.5%, -3.5%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.4%	[-1.8%, 0.9%]	7

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.2%	[0.4%, 2.8%]	3
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.2%	[0.4%, 2.8%]	3

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 673.716s -> 673.544s (-0.03%)
Artifact size: 314.08 MiB -> 314.03 MiB (-0.02%)

[lqd]

Regressions are noise.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged