Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Address unused tuple struct fields in the compiler #118382

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2023

Conversation

shepmaster
Copy link
Member

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 27, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 27, 2023

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

Some changes occurred in src/librustdoc/clean/types.rs

cc @camelid

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Well I'm not really supposed to review rustdoc or libs PRs, so can you revert those two and pull them into their own respective PRs?

After that, r=me

@shepmaster shepmaster force-pushed the unused-tuple-struct-field-cleanup branch from 4f62014 to 87380cb Compare November 27, 2023 18:55
@shepmaster shepmaster changed the title Address unused tuple struct fields Address unused tuple struct fields in the compiler Nov 27, 2023
@shepmaster
Copy link
Member Author

shepmaster commented Nov 27, 2023

@bors r=@compiler-errors rollup

@shepmaster
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=@compiler-errors rollup

(Both GitHub and I are having some issues, so giving this a second attempt).

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 27, 2023

📌 Commit 87380cb has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 27, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2023
…mpiler-errors

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#111133 (Detect Python-like slicing and suggest how to fix)
 - rust-lang#114708 (Allow setting `rla` labels via `rustbot`)
 - rust-lang#117526 (Account for `!` arm in tail `match` expr)
 - rust-lang#118172 (Add `pretty_terminator` to pretty stable-mir)
 - rust-lang#118202 (Added linker_arg(s) Linker trait methods for link-arg to be prefixed "-Wl," for cc-like linker args and not verbatim)
 - rust-lang#118374 (QueryContext: rename try_collect_active_jobs -> collect_active_jobs, change return type from Option<QueryMap> to QueryMap)
 - rust-lang#118381 (rustc_span: Use correct edit distance start length for suggestions)
 - rust-lang#118382 (Address unused tuple struct fields in the compiler)
 - rust-lang#118384 (Address unused tuple struct fields in rustdoc)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit fa636d0 into rust-lang:master Nov 28, 2023
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Nov 28, 2023
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#118382 - shepmaster:unused-tuple-struct-field-cleanup, r=compiler-errors

Address unused tuple struct fields in the compiler

r? `@compiler-errors`
@shepmaster shepmaster deleted the unused-tuple-struct-field-cleanup branch November 28, 2023 04:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants