-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix comments for unsigned non-zero checked_add
, saturating_add
#118397
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
For these two methods, `other` is an ordinary unsigned integer, so it can be zero. Since the sum of non-zero and zero is always non-zero, the safety argument holds even when `other` is zero.
r? @thomcc (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Nov 28, 2023
WaffleLapkin
approved these changes
Nov 28, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch, thanks
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Nov 28, 2023
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#115331 (optimize str::iter::Chars::advance_by) - rust-lang#118236 (Update mod comment) - rust-lang#118299 (Update `OnceLock` documentation to give a concrete 'lazy static' example, and expand on the existing example.) - rust-lang#118314 (Rename `{collections=>alloc}{tests,benches}`) - rust-lang#118341 (Simplify indenting in THIR printing) - rust-lang#118366 (Detect and reject malformed `repr(Rust)` hints) - rust-lang#118397 (Fix comments for unsigned non-zero `checked_add`, `saturating_add`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#118397 - Zalathar:nonzero, r=WaffleLapkin Fix comments for unsigned non-zero `checked_add`, `saturating_add` While looking at rust-lang#118313, I happened to notice that two of the expanded comments appear to be slightly inaccurate. For these two methods, `other` is an ordinary unsigned integer, so it can be zero. Since the sum of non-zero and zero is always non-zero, the safety argument holds even when `other` is zero.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While looking at #118313, I happened to notice that two of the expanded comments appear to be slightly inaccurate.
For these two methods,
other
is an ordinary unsigned integer, so it can be zero.Since the sum of non-zero and zero is always non-zero, the safety argument holds even when
other
is zero.