Lower some forgotten spans

[compiler-errors]

I wrote a HIR visitor that visited all of the spans in the HIR, and made it ICE when we have a unlowered span. That led me to discover these unlowered spans.

[rustbot]

r? @spastorino

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[compiler-errors]

Does this affect perf at all?

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit c980fae with merge 200b67b...

[spastorino]

Uhh, I remember that when I was doing the RPITIT refactor I've found also some of these.
I was wondering if there is a way that make sense to test this, anyway r=me with perf done.

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 200b67b (200b67b8d948a52971c51e68d8e48f989eaec236)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (200b67b): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.6%	[0.4%, 0.7%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.2%	[3.2%, 3.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-0.7%, -0.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.2%	[-0.7%, 0.7%]	3

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.4%	[-0.4%, -0.4%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-5.5%	[-5.8%, -5.3%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.4%	[-0.4%, -0.4%]	4

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 669.53s -> 668.841s (-0.10%)
Artifact size: 314.04 MiB -> 314.03 MiB (-0.00%)

[compiler-errors]

@bors r=spastorino rollup=maybe

[bors]

📌 Commit c980fae has been approved by spastorino

It is now in the queue for this repository.