Make std::os::unix::ucred module private
#122147
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
rustbot has assigned @workingjubilee. Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer |
rustbot
added
O-unix
Yes. What are the intended next steps after this? |
|
No idea :D |
|
Ah, I see. It took a moment to parse out your PR message (admittedly, "the caffeine hadn't kicked in yet" was contributing). The problem is that it is reexported elsewhere and this double-exposure is unintentional. Yes, that seems correct. @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2024
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#119888 (Stabilize the `#[diagnostic]` namespace and `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` attribute) - rust-lang#121089 (Remove `feed_local_def_id`) - rust-lang#122004 (AST validation: Improve handling of inherent impls nested within functions and anon consts) - rust-lang#122087 (Add missing background color for top-level rust documentation page and increase contrast by setting text color to black) - rust-lang#122136 (Include all library files in artifact summary on CI) - rust-lang#122137 (Don't pass a break scope to `Builder::break_for_else`) - rust-lang#122138 (Record mtime in bootstrap's LLVM linker script) - rust-lang#122141 (sync (try_)instantiate_mir_and_normalize_erasing_regions implementation) - rust-lang#122142 (cleanup rustc_infer) - rust-lang#122147 (Make `std::os::unix::ucred` module private) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#122147 - kadiwa4:private_impl_mods, r=workingjubilee Make `std::os::unix::ucred` module private Tracking issue: rust-lang#42839 Currently, this unstable module exists: [`std::os::unix::ucred`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/os/unix/ucred/index.html). All it does is provide `UCred` (which is also available from `std::os::unix::net`), `impl_*` (which is probably a mishap and should be private) and `peer_cred` (which is undocumented but has a documented counterpart at `std::os::unix::net::UnixStream::peer_cred`). This PR makes the entire `ucred` module private and moves it into `net`, because that's where it is used. I hope it's fine to simply remove it without a deprecation phase. Otherwise, I can add back a deprecated reexport module `std::os::unix::ucred`. `@rustbot` label: -T-libs +T-libs-api
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tracking issue: #42839
Currently, this unstable module exists:
std::os::unix::ucred.All it does is provide
UCred(which is also available fromstd::os::unix::net),impl_*(which is probably a mishap and should be private) andpeer_cred(which is undocumented but has a documented counterpart atstd::os::unix::net::UnixStream::peer_cred).This PR makes the entire
ucredmodule private and moves it intonet, because that's where it is used.I hope it's fine to simply remove it without a deprecation phase. Otherwise, I can add back a deprecated reexport module
std::os::unix::ucred.@rustbot label: -T-libs +T-libs-api