-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 10 pull requests #122151
Rollup of 10 pull requests #122151
Conversation
…mented]` attribute This PR stabilizes the `#[diagnostic]` attribute namespace and a minimal option of the `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` attribute. The `#[diagnostic]` attribute namespace is meant to provide a home for attributes that allow users to influence error messages emitted by the compiler. The compiler is not guaranteed to use any of this hints, however it should accept any (non-)existing attribute in this namespace and potentially emit lint-warnings for unused attributes and options. This is meant to allow discarding certain attributes/options in the future to allow fundamental changes to the compiler without the need to keep then non-meaningful options working. The `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` attribute is allowed to appear on a trait definition. This allows crate authors to hint the compiler to emit a specific error message if a certain trait is not implemented. For the `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` attribute the following options are implemented: * `message` which provides the text for the top level error message * `label` which provides the text for the label shown inline in the broken code in the error message * `note` which provides additional notes. The `note` option can appear several times, which results in several note messages being emitted. If any of the other options appears several times the first occurrence of the relevant option specifies the actually used value. Any other occurrence generates an lint warning. For any other non-existing option a lint-warning is generated. All three options accept a text as argument. This text is allowed to contain format parameters referring to generic argument or `Self` by name via the `{Self}` or `{NameOfGenericArgument}` syntax. For any non-existing argument a lint warning is generated. Tracking issue: rust-lang#111996
…tions and anon consts
…d increase contrast by setting text color to black
This method would previously take a target scope, and then verify that it was equal to the scope on top of the if-then scope stack. In practice, this means that callers have to go out of their way to pass around redundant scope information that's already on the if-then stack. So it's easier to just retrieve the correct scope directly from the if-then stack, and simplify the other code that was passing it around.
This will avoid rebuilds due to the script being more recent than the rest of the original files.
try_instantiate_mir_and_normalize_erasing_regions was changed in rust-lang@dbc2cc8, but not instantiate_mir_and_normalize_erasing_regions
…pace, r=compiler-errors Stabilize the `#[diagnostic]` namespace and `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` attribute This PR stabilizes the `#[diagnostic]` attribute namespace and a minimal option of the `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` attribute. The `#[diagnostic]` attribute namespace is meant to provide a home for attributes that allow users to influence error messages emitted by the compiler. The compiler is not guaranteed to use any of this hints, however it should accept any (non-)existing attribute in this namespace and potentially emit lint-warnings for unused attributes and options. This is meant to allow discarding certain attributes/options in the future to allow fundamental changes to the compiler without the need to keep then non-meaningful options working. The `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` attribute is allowed to appear on a trait definition. This allows crate authors to hint the compiler to emit a specific error message if a certain trait is not implemented. For the `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` attribute the following options are implemented: * `message` which provides the text for the top level error message * `label` which provides the text for the label shown inline in the broken code in the error message * `note` which provides additional notes. The `note` option can appear several times, which results in several note messages being emitted. If any of the other options appears several times the first occurrence of the relevant option specifies the actually used value. Any other occurrence generates an lint warning. For any other non-existing option a lint-warning is generated. All three options accept a text as argument. This text is allowed to contain format parameters referring to generic argument or `Self` by name via the `{Self}` or `{NameOfGenericArgument}` syntax. For any non-existing argument a lint warning is generated. This allows to have a trait definition like: ```rust #[diagnostic::on_unimplemented( message = "My Message for `ImportantTrait<{A}>` is not implemented for `{Self}`", label = "My Label", note = "Note 1", note = "Note 2" )] trait ImportantTrait<A> {} ``` which then generates for the following code ```rust fn use_my_trait(_: impl ImportantTrait<i32>) {} fn main() { use_my_trait(String::new()); } ``` this error message: ``` error[E0277]: My Message for `ImportantTrait<i32>` is not implemented for `String` --> src/main.rs:14:18 | 14 | use_my_trait(String::new()); | ------------ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ My Label | | | required by a bound introduced by this call | = help: the trait `ImportantTrait<i32>` is not implemented for `String` = note: Note 1 = note: Note 2 ``` [Playground with the unstable feature](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=05133acce8e1d163d481e97631f17536) Fixes rust-lang#111996
…enkov Remove `feed_local_def_id` best reviewed commit by commit Basically I returned `TyCtxtFeed` from `create_def` and then preserved that in the local caches based on rust-lang#121084 r? ````@petrochenkov````
…piler-errors AST validation: Improve handling of inherent impls nested within functions and anon consts Minimal fix for issue rust-lang#121607 extracted from PR rust-lang#120698 for ease of backporting and since I'd like to improve PR rust-lang#120698 in such a way that it makes AST validator truly robust against such sort of regressions (AST validator is generally *beyond* footgun-y atm). The current version of PR rust-lang#120698 sort of does that already but there's still room for improvement. Fixes rust-lang#89342. Fixes [after beta-backport] rust-lang#121607. Partially addresses rust-lang#119924 (rust-lang#120698 aims to fully fix it). --- ### Explainer The last commit of PR rust-lang#119505 regressed issue rust-lang#121607. Previously we would reject visibilities on associated items with `visibility_not_permitted` if we were in a trait (by checking the parameter `ctxt` of `visit_assoc_item` which was 100% accurate) or if we were in a trait impl (by checking a flag called `in_trait_impl` tracked in `AstValidator` which was/is only accurate if the visitor methods correctly updated it which isn't actually the case giving rise to the old open issue rust-lang#89342). In PR rust-lang#119505, I moved even more state into the `AstValidator` by generalizing the flag `in_trait_impl` to `trait_or_trait_impl` to be able to report more precise diagnostics (modeling *Trait | TraitImpl*). However since we/I didn't update `trait_or_trait_impl` in all places to reflect reality (similar to us not updating `in_trait_impl` before), this lead to rust-lang#121607 (comment) getting wrongfully rejected. Since PR rust-lang#119505 we reject visibilities if the “globally tracked” (wrt. to `AstValidator`) `outer_trait_or_trait_impl` is `Some`. Crucially, when visiting an inherent impl, I never reset `outer_trait_or_trait_impl` back to `None` leading us to believe that `bar` in the stack [`trait Foo` > `fn foo` > `impl Bar` > `pub fn bar`] (from the MCVE) was an inherent associated item (we saw `trait Foo` but not `impl Bar` before it). The old open issue rust-lang#89342 is caused by the aforementioned issue of us never updating `in_trait_impl` prior to my PR rust-lang#119505 / `outer_trait_or_trait` after my PR. Stack: [`impl Default for Foo` > `{` > `impl Foo` > `pub const X`] (we only saw `impl Default for Foo` but not the `impl Foo` before it). --- This PR is only meant to be a *hot fix*. I plan on completely *rewriting* `AstValidator` from the ground up to not rely on “globally tracked” state like this or at least make it close to impossible to forget updating it when descending into nested items (etc.). Other visitors do a way better job at that (e.g. AST lowering). I actually plan on experimenting with moving more and more logic from `AstValidator` into the AST lowering pass/stage/visitor to follow the [Parse, don't validate](https://lexi-lambda.github.io/blog/2019/11/05/parse-don-t-validate/) “pattern”. --- r? `@compiler-errors`
…, r=notriddle Add missing background color for top-level rust documentation page and increase contrast by setting text color to black Fixes rust-lang#121954. r? ``@notriddle``
…rk-Simulacrum Include all library files in artifact summary on CI It's not worth it to maintain any custom logic here. Just print all files in the `lib` directory, this should be forward compatible. This fixes rust-lang#121866, based on rust-lang#121967. r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
…jasper Don't pass a break scope to `Builder::break_for_else` This method would previously take a target scope, and then verify that it was equal to the scope on top of the if-then scope stack. In practice, this means that callers have to go out of their way to pass around redundant scope information that's already on the if-then stack. So it's easier to just retrieve the correct scope directly from the if-then stack, and simplify the other code that was passing it around. --- Both ways of indicating the break target were introduced in rust-lang#88572. I haven't been able to find any strong indication of whether this was done deliberately, or whether it was just an implementation artifact. But to me it doesn't seem useful to carefully pass around the same scope in two different ways.
Record mtime in bootstrap's LLVM linker script As discovered in https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/.60ui.60.20tests.20re-running.3F the linker script added in rust-lang#121967 can trigger rebuilds or new test executions, as it's more recent than some of the existing files themselves. This PR copies the mtime to the linker script to prevent a second invocation of `./x test tests/ui` from rerunning all of the tests.
sync (try_)instantiate_mir_and_normalize_erasing_regions implementation `try_instantiate_mir_and_normalize_erasing_regions` was changed in rust-lang@dbc2cc8, but not `instantiate_mir_and_normalize_erasing_regions`, sync them. see https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/instantiate_mir_and_normalize_erasing_regions.20vs.20try_*.20ver r? `@lcnr`
…er-errors cleanup rustc_infer the commits should be self-contained r? types
…ngjubilee Make `std::os::unix::ucred` module private Tracking issue: rust-lang#42839 Currently, this unstable module exists: [`std::os::unix::ucred`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/os/unix/ucred/index.html). All it does is provide `UCred` (which is also available from `std::os::unix::net`), `impl_*` (which is probably a mishap and should be private) and `peer_cred` (which is undocumented but has a documented counterpart at `std::os::unix::net::UnixStream::peer_cred`). This PR makes the entire `ucred` module private and moves it into `net`, because that's where it is used. I hope it's fine to simply remove it without a deprecation phase. Otherwise, I can add back a deprecated reexport module `std::os::unix::ucred`. `@rustbot` label: -T-libs +T-libs-api
@bors r+ p=5 rollup=never |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 9c3ad802d9 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
Finished benchmarking commit (9823f17): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 647.485s -> 648.175s (0.11%) |
Successful merges:
#[diagnostic]
namespace and#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]
attribute #119888 (Stabilize the#[diagnostic]
namespace and#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]
attribute)feed_local_def_id
#121089 (Removefeed_local_def_id
)Builder::break_for_else
#122137 (Don't pass a break scope toBuilder::break_for_else
)std::os::unix::ucred
module private #122147 (Makestd::os::unix::ucred
module private)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup