Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hide async_gen_internals from standard library documentation #123528

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2024

Conversation

dtolnay
Copy link
Member

@dtolnay dtolnay commented Apr 6, 2024

These are from #118420. It doesn't appear that there is any intention to ever make these APIs available to user code. These are just conveniences meant for the compiler's implementation of async gen. I don't think having them featured in documentation in https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.77.1/core/task/enum.Poll.html is appropriate.

image

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 6, 2024

r? @Nilstrieb

rustbot has assigned @Nilstrieb.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 6, 2024
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

🤦

Whoops. Sorry.

These are just conveniences meant for the compiler's implementation of async gen.

This is correct

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 6, 2024

📌 Commit 262670a has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 6, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#123294 (Require LLVM_CONFIG to be set in rustc_llvm/build.rs)
 - rust-lang#123467 (MSVC targets should use COFF as their archive format)
 - rust-lang#123498 (explaining `DefKind::Field`)
 - rust-lang#123519 (Improve cfg and check-cfg configuration)
 - rust-lang#123525 (CFI: Don't rewrite ty::Dynamic directly)
 - rust-lang#123526 (Do not ICE when calling incorrectly defined `transmute` intrinsic)
 - rust-lang#123528 (Hide async_gen_internals from standard library documentation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 58ac1b4 into rust-lang:master Apr 6, 2024
11 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#123528 - dtolnay:asyncgeninternals, r=compiler-errors

Hide async_gen_internals from standard library documentation

These are from rust-lang#118420. It doesn't appear that there is any intention to ever make these APIs available to user code. These are just conveniences meant for the compiler's implementation of `async gen`. I don't think having them featured in documentation in <https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.77.1/core/task/enum.Poll.html> is appropriate.

![image](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/assets/1940490/0a8ae90d-5c83-4ab1-b08a-50bad2433d69)
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Apr 6, 2024
@dtolnay dtolnay deleted the asyncgeninternals branch May 10, 2024 17:52
@dtolnay dtolnay added A-async-await Area: Async & Await F-gen_blocks `gen {}` expressions that produce `Iterator`s and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-async-await Area: Async & Await F-gen_blocks `gen {}` expressions that produce `Iterator`s T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants