Extract coverage-specific code out of compiletest::runtest
#125719
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This moves a few hundred lines of coverage-specific code out of the main module, making navigation a bit easier.
|
r? @clubby789 rustbot has assigned @clubby789. Use |
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
|
Some changes occurred in src/tools/compiletest cc @jieyouxu |
|
Thanks! |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#124655 (Add `-Zfixed-x18`) - rust-lang#125693 (Format all source files in `tests/coverage/`) - rust-lang#125700 (coverage: Avoid overflow when the MC/DC condition limit is exceeded) - rust-lang#125705 (Reintroduce name resolution check for trying to access locals from an inline const) - rust-lang#125708 (tier 3 target policy: clarify the point about producing assembly) - rust-lang#125715 (remove unneeded extern crate in rmake test) - rust-lang#125719 (Extract coverage-specific code out of `compiletest::runtest`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#125719 - Zalathar:run-coverage, r=jieyouxu Extract coverage-specific code out of `compiletest::runtest` I had been vaguely intending to do this for a while, but seeing rust-lang#89475 on the compiletest dashboard inspired me to actually go and do it. This moves a few hundred lines of coverage-specific code out of the main module, making navigation a bit easier. There is still a small amount of coverage-specific logic in broader functions in that module, since it can't easily be moved. This is just cut-and-paste plus fixing visibility and imports, so no functional changes. I also removed the unit test for anonymizing line numbers in MC/DC reports, as foreshadowed by the comment I wrote when adding it. That functionality is now adequately exercised by the actual snapshot tests for MC/DC coverage. (Removing the test now avoids the need to move it, or to make the function it calls visible.)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I had been vaguely intending to do this for a while, but seeing #89475 on the compiletest dashboard inspired me to actually go and do it.
This moves a few hundred lines of coverage-specific code out of the main module, making navigation a bit easier. There is still a small amount of coverage-specific logic in broader functions in that module, since it can't easily be moved.
This is just cut-and-paste plus fixing visibility and imports, so no functional changes.
I also removed the unit test for anonymizing line numbers in MC/DC reports, as foreshadowed by the comment I wrote when adding it. That functionality is now adequately exercised by the actual snapshot tests for MC/DC coverage.
(Removing the test now avoids the need to move it, or to make the function it calls visible.)