Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 3 pull requests #126581

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 17, 2024
Merged

Rollup of 3 pull requests #126581

merged 6 commits into from
Jun 17, 2024

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

gurry and others added 6 commits June 10, 2024 16:28
PR rust-lang#121208 converted this from a `span_delayed_bug` to a `span_bug`
because nothing in the test suite caused execution to hit this path. But
now fuzzing has found a test case that does hit it. So this commit
converts it back to `span_delayed_bug` and adds the relevant test.

Fixes rust-lang#126385.
…ugg, r=oli-obk

Make suggestion to change `Fn` to `FnMut` work with methods as well

Fixes rust-lang#125325

The issue occurred because the code that emitted the suggestion to change `Fn` to `FnMut` worked only for function calls  and not method calls. This PR makes it work with methods as well.
Convert a `span_bug` to a `span_delayed_bug`.

PR rust-lang#121208 converted this from a `span_delayed_bug` to a `span_bug` because nothing in the test suite caused execution to hit this path. But now fuzzing has found a test case that does hit it. So this commit converts it back to `span_delayed_bug` and adds the relevant test.

Fixes rust-lang#126385.

r? `@lcnr`
…ion, r=bjorn3

Add `run-make/const_fn_mir` missing test annotation

Fixes comment from rust-lang#126270.

r? `@bjorn3`
@rustbot rustbot added A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jun 17, 2024
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=3 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 17, 2024

📌 Commit 9092ffb has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 17, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 17, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 9092ffb with merge 3baa20b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 17, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing 3baa20b to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 17, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 3baa20b into rust-lang:master Jun 17, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jun 17, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#126226 Make suggestion to change Fn to FnMut work with methods… 5fee5d0ed049019682ca77a2e1ed7b7da20ddbbd (link)
#126570 Convert a span_bug to a span_delayed_bug. c15cef6c5ad9a4907273de0a6783466b568dd970 (link)
#126580 Add run-make/const_fn_mir missing test annotation d5f21529087a315b6854b05f4b57517d43d6dba6 (link)

previous master: e23ae72ac7

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the rollup-dx4fadn branch June 17, 2024 12:06
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (3baa20b): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.3% [1.3%, 1.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.3% [-0.4%, -0.2%] 6
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.3% [-0.4%, -0.2%] 6

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

Results (secondary -3.4%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.4% [-5.5%, -2.1%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 671.588s -> 669.445s (-0.32%)
Artifact size: 319.89 MiB -> 320.51 MiB (0.19%)

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Jun 17, 2024
@rylev
Copy link
Member

rylev commented Jun 20, 2024

Regression might be noise (and isn't big enough to care about even if it isn't)

@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. label Jun 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants