-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix break_last_token
.
#130551
Merged
Merged
Fix break_last_token
.
#130551
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Sep 19, 2024
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
nnethercote
force-pushed
the
fix-break-last-token
branch
2 times, most recently
from
September 20, 2024 00:51
961e887
to
2303911
Compare
petrochenkov
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Sep 20, 2024
ajgrah2000
reviewed
Sep 21, 2024
nnethercote
force-pushed
the
fix-break-last-token
branch
from
September 22, 2024 23:09
2303911
to
d3d9544
Compare
It currently doesn't handle the three-char tokens `>>=` and `<<=` correctly. These can be broken twice, resulting in three individual tokens. This is a latent bug that currently doesn't cause any problems, but does cause problems for rust-lang#124141, because that PR increases the usage of lazy token streams.
nnethercote
force-pushed
the
fix-break-last-token
branch
from
September 22, 2024 23:15
d3d9544
to
73cc575
Compare
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
labels
Sep 23, 2024
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2024
…r=petrochenkov Fix `break_last_token`. It currently doesn't handle the three-char tokens `>>=` and `<<=` correctly. These can be broken twice, resulting in three individual tokens. This is a latent bug that currently doesn't cause any problems, but does cause problems for rust-lang#124141, because that PR increases the usage of lazy token streams. r? `@petrochenkov`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2024
…kingjubilee Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#129201 (std: implement the `random` feature (alternative version)) - rust-lang#130536 (bootstrap: Set the dylib path when building books with rustdoc) - rust-lang#130551 (Fix `break_last_token`.) - rust-lang#130657 (Remove x86_64-fuchsia and aarch64-fuchsia target aliases) - rust-lang#130721 (Add more test cases for block-no-opening-brace) - rust-lang#130736 (Add rustfmt 2024 reformatting to git blame ignore) - rust-lang#130746 (readd `@tgross35` and `@joboet` to the review rotation) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#130551 - nnethercote:fix-break-last-token, r=petrochenkov Fix `break_last_token`. It currently doesn't handle the three-char tokens `>>=` and `<<=` correctly. These can be broken twice, resulting in three individual tokens. This is a latent bug that currently doesn't cause any problems, but does cause problems for rust-lang#124141, because that PR increases the usage of lazy token streams. r? `@petrochenkov`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It currently doesn't handle the three-char tokens
>>=
and<<=
correctly. These can be broken twice, resulting in three individual tokens. This is a latent bug that currently doesn't cause any problems, but does cause problems for #124141, because that PR increases the usage of lazy token streams.r? @petrochenkov