-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 13.9k
switch unicode-data bitsets back to 'static' #131641
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great!
I wonder if it makes any difference to change the types from &'static [T; N] to [T; N]. That's how it was prior to #101401. r=me either way.
5f1e903 to
90e4f10
Compare
|
Ah good point, I had missed that. Yes we can make them arrays again without an extra indirection. @bors r=dtolnay |
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#131086 (Update unicode-width to 0.2.0) - rust-lang#131585 (compiletest: Remove the one thing that was checking a directive's `original_line`) - rust-lang#131614 (Error on trying to use revisions in `run-make` tests) - rust-lang#131638 (compiletest: Move debugger setup code out of `lib.rs`) - rust-lang#131641 (switch unicode-data bitsets back to 'static') - rust-lang#131642 (Special case error message for a `build-fail` test that failed check build) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of rust-lang#131641 - RalfJung:unicode-bitset-static, r=dtolnay switch unicode-data bitsets back to 'static' Back in rust-lang#101401, these were changed to `const` to make some functions `const fn`. However, `@dtolnay` was [not happy](rust-lang#101400 (comment)) about this. Meanwhile, `const fn` can access immutable statics like these, so we can change this back. Part of rust-lang#101400.
Back in #101401, these were changed to
constto make some functionsconst fn. However, @dtolnay was not happy about this. Meanwhile,const fncan access immutable statics like these, so we can change this back.Part of #101400.