Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Keep track of patterns that could have introduced a binding, but didn't #134284

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@estebank estebank commented Dec 13, 2024

When we recover from a pattern parse error, or a pattern uses .., we keep track of that and affect resolution error for missing bindings that could have been provided by that pattern. We differentiate between .. and parse recovery. We silence resolution errors likely caused by the pattern parse error.

error[E0425]: cannot find value `title` in this scope
  --> $DIR/struct-pattern-with-missing-fields-resolve-error.rs:18:30
   |
LL |     if let Website { url, .. } = website {
   |            ------------------- this pattern doesn't include `title`, which is available in `Website`
LL |         println!("[{}]({})", title, url);
   |                              ^^^^^ not found in this scope

Fix #74863.

When we recover from a pattern parse error, or a pattern uses `..`, we keep track of that and affect resolution error for missing bindings that could have been provided by that pattern. We differentiate between `..` and parse recovery. We silence resolution errors likely caused by the pattern parse error.

```
error[E0425]: cannot find value `title` in this scope
  --> $DIR/struct-pattern-with-missing-fields-resolve-error.rs:19:30
   |
LL |         println!("[{}]({})", title, url);
   |                              ^^^^^ not found in this scope
   |
note: `Website` has a field `title` which could have been included in this pattern, but it wasn't
  --> $DIR/struct-pattern-with-missing-fields-resolve-error.rs:17:12
   |
LL | / struct Website {
LL | |     url: String,
LL | |     title: Option<String> ,
   | |     ----- defined here
LL | | }
   | |_-
...
LL |       if let Website { url, .. } = website {
   |              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this pattern doesn't include `title`, which is available in `Website`
```

Fix rust-lang#74863.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 13, 2024

r? @lcnr

rustbot has assigned @lcnr.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 13, 2024
@@ -264,12 +264,17 @@ impl RibKind<'_> {
#[derive(Debug)]
pub(crate) struct Rib<'ra, R = Res> {
pub bindings: IdentMap<R>,
pub patterns_with_skipped_bindings: FxHashMap<DefId, Vec<(Span, bool /* recovered error */)>>,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why use a bool for recovered error when we have Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed>?

@cjgillot cjgillot self-assigned this Dec 16, 2024
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

lcnr commented Dec 16, 2024

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 16, 2024

📌 Commit 733fd03 has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 16, 2024
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
Keep track of patterns that could have introduced a binding, but didn't

When we recover from a pattern parse error, or a pattern uses `..`, we keep track of that and affect resolution error for missing bindings that could have been provided by that pattern. We differentiate between `..` and parse recovery. We silence resolution errors likely caused by the pattern parse error.

```
error[E0425]: cannot find value `title` in this scope
  --> $DIR/struct-pattern-with-missing-fields-resolve-error.rs:18:30
   |
LL |     if let Website { url, .. } = website {
   |            ------------------- this pattern doesn't include `title`, which is available in `Website`
LL |         println!("[{}]({})", title, url);
   |                              ^^^^^ not found in this scope
```

Fix rust-lang#74863.
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
Keep track of patterns that could have introduced a binding, but didn't

When we recover from a pattern parse error, or a pattern uses `..`, we keep track of that and affect resolution error for missing bindings that could have been provided by that pattern. We differentiate between `..` and parse recovery. We silence resolution errors likely caused by the pattern parse error.

```
error[E0425]: cannot find value `title` in this scope
  --> $DIR/struct-pattern-with-missing-fields-resolve-error.rs:18:30
   |
LL |     if let Website { url, .. } = website {
   |            ------------------- this pattern doesn't include `title`, which is available in `Website`
LL |         println!("[{}]({})", title, url);
   |                              ^^^^^ not found in this scope
```

Fix rust-lang#74863.
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
Keep track of patterns that could have introduced a binding, but didn't

When we recover from a pattern parse error, or a pattern uses `..`, we keep track of that and affect resolution error for missing bindings that could have been provided by that pattern. We differentiate between `..` and parse recovery. We silence resolution errors likely caused by the pattern parse error.

```
error[E0425]: cannot find value `title` in this scope
  --> $DIR/struct-pattern-with-missing-fields-resolve-error.rs:18:30
   |
LL |     if let Website { url, .. } = website {
   |            ------------------- this pattern doesn't include `title`, which is available in `Website`
LL |         println!("[{}]({})", title, url);
   |                              ^^^^^ not found in this scope
```

Fix rust-lang#74863.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
…llaumeGomez

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#132056 (Stabilize `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]`)
 - rust-lang#134124 (CI: use free runners for x86_64-gnu-llvm jobs)
 - rust-lang#134197 (rustc_mir_build: Clarify that 'mirrored' does not mean 'flipped' or 'reversed')
 - rust-lang#134260 (Correctly handle comments in attributes in doctests source code)
 - rust-lang#134277 (rustdoc-search: handle `impl Into<X>` better)
 - rust-lang#134284 (Keep track of patterns that could have introduced a binding, but didn't)
 - rust-lang#134337 (reject unsound toggling of RISCV target features)
 - rust-lang#134385 (tests/ui/asm: Remove uses of rustc_attrs, lang_items, and decl_macro features by using minicore)
 - rust-lang#134386 (Some trait method vs impl method signature difference diagnostic cleanups)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#134124 (CI: use free runners for x86_64-gnu-llvm jobs)
 - rust-lang#134197 (rustc_mir_build: Clarify that 'mirrored' does not mean 'flipped' or 'reversed')
 - rust-lang#134260 (Correctly handle comments in attributes in doctests source code)
 - rust-lang#134277 (rustdoc-search: handle `impl Into<X>` better)
 - rust-lang#134284 (Keep track of patterns that could have introduced a binding, but didn't)
 - rust-lang#134337 (reject unsound toggling of RISCV target features)
 - rust-lang#134371 (Check for array lengths that aren't actually `usize`)
 - rust-lang#134385 (tests/ui/asm: Remove uses of rustc_attrs, lang_items, and decl_macro features by using minicore)
 - rust-lang#134386 (Some trait method vs impl method signature difference diagnostic cleanups)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 86db97e into rust-lang:master Dec 16, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.85.0 milestone Dec 16, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134284 - estebank:issue-74863, r=lcnr

Keep track of patterns that could have introduced a binding, but didn't

When we recover from a pattern parse error, or a pattern uses `..`, we keep track of that and affect resolution error for missing bindings that could have been provided by that pattern. We differentiate between `..` and parse recovery. We silence resolution errors likely caused by the pattern parse error.

```
error[E0425]: cannot find value `title` in this scope
  --> $DIR/struct-pattern-with-missing-fields-resolve-error.rs:18:30
   |
LL |     if let Website { url, .. } = website {
   |            ------------------- this pattern doesn't include `title`, which is available in `Website`
LL |         println!("[{}]({})", title, url);
   |                              ^^^^^ not found in this scope
```

Fix rust-lang#74863.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Error on struct pattern with enum
6 participants