Skip to content

De-duplicate f16 & f128 doctest attributes #142192

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Urgau
Copy link
Member

@Urgau Urgau commented Jun 8, 2025

Now that rustdoc supports #[doc(test(attr(...)))] at every level, thanks to #140560, we can de-duplicate the f16 & f128 doctest attributes.

Unfortunately we can de-duplicate the cfgs attribute as rustdoc would complain about missing main, but it's already much better than before.

Addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140323/files#r2062702761
r? @tgross35

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 8, 2025
@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

tgross35 commented Jun 9, 2025

Awesome, thank you for getting both the implementation and this change through!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 9, 2025

📌 Commit fdae344 has been approved by tgross35

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants