Skip to content

Conversation

Qelxiros
Copy link
Contributor

ACP: rust-lang/libs-team#604

@rustbot label +needs-fcp

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 22, 2025

r? @tgross35

rustbot has assigned @tgross35.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, or significant enough to need a team FCP to proceed. labels Jul 22, 2025
@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

Could you add some tests to library/coretests/tests/iter/traits/accum.rs verifying the behavior?

@rustbot label +I-libs-api-nominated

@rustbot rustbot added the I-libs-api-nominated Nominated for discussion during a libs-api team meeting. label Jul 22, 2025
@Amanieu
Copy link
Member

Amanieu commented Jul 22, 2025

FCP since this is insta-stable.

@rfcbot merge

@rfcbot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@rfcbot rfcbot added proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. labels Jul 22, 2025
@Amanieu Amanieu removed the I-libs-api-nominated Nominated for discussion during a libs-api team meeting. label Jul 22, 2025
@Amanieu Amanieu added T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. and removed T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 22, 2025
@Amanieu

This comment was marked as outdated.

@rfcbot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@rfcbot rfcbot removed proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. labels Jul 22, 2025
@Amanieu

This comment was marked as outdated.

@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Jul 22, 2025

Team member @Amanieu has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members:

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@rfcbot rfcbot added proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. labels Jul 22, 2025
@rfcbot rfcbot added final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. and removed proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. labels Aug 5, 2025
@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Aug 5, 2025

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

@Qelxiros Qelxiros force-pushed the saturating-arithmetic branch from e37610c to d8d1462 Compare August 5, 2025 23:54
@rfcbot rfcbot added finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting and removed final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. labels Aug 15, 2025
@rfcbot
Copy link

rfcbot commented Aug 15, 2025

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed.

This will be merged soon.

Copy link
Contributor

@tgross35 tgross35 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me with one nit and a squash

Cc @joshtriplett, in rust-lang/libs-team#604 (comment) you said:

We can settle that question in the FCP that we'll need for the PR (which will be insta-stable). Meanwhile, please go ahead with a PR adding this for unsigned Saturating types, and mark it as needs-fcp. Thank you!

This wasn't explicitly mentioned on this thread (outside of the8472's docs request), so I'm just clarifying here that the current implementation does not short circuit (which seems reasonable).

View changes since this review

@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@Qelxiros Qelxiros force-pushed the saturating-arithmetic branch from 209c296 to 1a33d62 Compare August 28, 2025 22:43
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 28, 2025

This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 28, 2025

📌 Commit 1a33d62 has been approved by tgross35

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 28, 2025
@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

@bors rollup

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2025
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #143713 (Add a mailmap entry for gnzlbg)
 - #144275 (implement Sum and Product for Saturating(u*))
 - #144354 (fix(std): Fix undefined reference to __my_thread_exit on QNX 8.0)
 - #145387 (Remove TmpLayout in layout_of_enum)
 - #145793 (std library: use execinfo library also on NetBSD.)
 - #145884 (Test `instrument-mcount` codegen)
 - #145947 (Add more to the `[workspace.dependencies]` section in the top-level `Cargo.toml`)
 - #145972 (fix `core::marker::Destruct` doc)
 - #145977 (tests: Ignore basic-stepping.rs on riscv64)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit ef50370 into rust-lang:master Aug 29, 2025
10 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.91.0 milestone Aug 29, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2025
Rollup merge of #144275 - Qelxiros:saturating-arithmetic, r=tgross35

implement Sum and Product for Saturating(u*)

ACP: rust-lang/libs-team#604

`@rustbot` label +needs-fcp
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

Already merged.
@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, or significant enough to need a team FCP to proceed. S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.