fix error on missing value for -C flags#153043
Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom Feb 24, 2026
Merged
fix error on missing value for -C flags#153043rust-bors[bot] merged 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
rust-bors[bot] merged 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
r? @chenyukang rustbot has assigned @chenyukang. Use Why was this reviewer chosen?The reviewer was selected based on:
|
Member
|
👍 r? me r=me when green |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
8b257f4 to
99a4aa1
Compare
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Contributor
rust-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2026
…uwer Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - #152176 (Neon fast path for str::contains) - #152657 (std: move `exit` out of PAL) - #152841 (Streamline `QueryVTableUnerased` into `GetQueryVTable`) - #152845 (Skip `tidy` in PR CI jobs not dedicated to running `tidy`) - #152897 (Add optional json logging) - #153009 (Remove `rustc_feedable_queries` and `define_feedable` macros.) - #151558 (Port diagnostic attributes) - #152492 (mGCA: Enforce WF element types for array valtrees) - #152888 (Fix async drop glue MIR bug) - #152988 (Port `#[register_tool]` to the new attribute system) - #153018 (`unused_must_use` lint improvements) - #153023 (Update books) - #153033 (Clarify how "ensure" queries check whether they can skip execution) - #153043 (fix error on missing value for -C flags) - #153045 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update) Failed merges: - #153032 (Fix attribute parser and kind names.)
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2026
Rollup merge of #153043 - RalfJung:c-flag-missing, r=lqd fix error on missing value for -C flags Before: ``` error: codegen option `panic` requires either `unwind`, `abort`, or `immediate-abort` (C panic=<value>) ``` After: ``` error: codegen option `panic` requires either `unwind`, `abort`, or `immediate-abort` (`-C panic=<value>`) ``` The second commit renames a field in the options macro for better consistency; that did not seem worth its own PR.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before:
After:
The second commit renames a field in the options macro for better consistency; that did not seem worth its own PR.