-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unstabilise words
for now.
#22253
Merged
Merged
Unstabilise words
for now.
#22253
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
@huonw Would you mind introducing a separate feature name here (perhaps our first such use of the system??) Unlike the "collections" feature, I could see this feature persisting as unstable for some time. Which makes me realize we need conventions for feature names... Perhaps |
It is not totally clear if we should just use whitespace, or if the full unicode word-breaking algorithm is more correct. If there is demand we can reconsider this decision (and consider the precise algorithm to use in detail). cc rust-lang#15628.
huonw
force-pushed
the
unstable-words
branch
from
February 13, 2015 03:30
2657ec0
to
3d9528a
Compare
@bors rollup |
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2015
It is not totally clear if we should just use whitespace, or if the full unicode word-breaking algorithm is more correct. If there is demand we can reconsider this decision (and consider the precise algorithm to use in detail). cc rust-lang#15628.
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2015
It is not totally clear if we should just use whitespace, or if the full unicode word-breaking algorithm is more correct. If there is demand we can reconsider this decision (and consider the precise algorithm to use in detail). cc rust-lang#15628.
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2015
It is not totally clear if we should just use whitespace, or if the full unicode word-breaking algorithm is more correct. If there is demand we can reconsider this decision (and consider the precise algorithm to use in detail). cc rust-lang#15628.
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2015
It is not totally clear if we should just use whitespace, or if the full unicode word-breaking algorithm is more correct. If there is demand we can reconsider this decision (and consider the precise algorithm to use in detail). cc rust-lang#15628.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It is not totally clear if we should just use whitespace, or if the full
unicode word-breaking algorithm is more correct. If there is demand we
can reconsider this decision (and consider the precise algorithm to use
in detail).
cc #15628.