Skip to content

Grammar improvements #24924

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 30, 2015
Merged

Grammar improvements #24924

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 30, 2015

Conversation

carols10cents
Copy link
Member

I'm interested in helping out with #16676 but more in the grammar than the reference-- here's my first chunk, more to come!! 🎉

I did pull a bit out of the reference, though, that was more relevant to the grammar but wasn't moved over as part of #24729.

I'm looking at, e.g. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/libsyntax/ast.rs, as the source of truth, please let me know if I should be checking against something else instead/in addition.

r? @steveklabnik

`enum_item` appeared in the `item` list but did not have an associated section;
`const_item` had a section but did not appear in the list.
Reword so that the references to things above/below are up to date and a
bit more specific.
@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ 0ddee94 rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 30, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 0ddee94 with merge b2ae102...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 30, 2015

💔 Test failed - auto-mac-64-nopt-t

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: retry

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 8:16 AM, bors notifications@github.com wrote:

[image: 💔] Test failed - auto-mac-64-nopt-t
http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-mac-64-nopt-t/builds/4770


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#24924 (comment).

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 30, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 0ddee94 with merge 2568a4d...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2015
I'm interested in helping out with #16676 but more in the grammar than the reference-- here's my first chunk, more to come!! 🎉 

I did pull a bit *out* of the reference, though, that was more relevant to the grammar but wasn't moved over as part of #24729.

I'm looking at, e.g. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/libsyntax/ast.rs, as the source of truth, please let me know if I should be checking against something else instead/in addition.

r? @steveklabnik
@bors bors merged commit 0ddee94 into rust-lang:master Apr 30, 2015
@carols10cents carols10cents deleted the grammar-improvements branch April 30, 2015 20:54
@carols10cents
Copy link
Member Author

😄 thank youuu! 💟

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants