Skip to content

Make all leaks safe in language reference #26078

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2015
Merged

Make all leaks safe in language reference #26078

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2015

Conversation

diwic
Copy link
Contributor

@diwic diwic commented Jun 7, 2015

It was determined that no leaks were unsafe, make the language reference clear about this.

Since it was determined that no leaks were unsafe, some of the documentation is still not clear about this. Here's one example.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ 33118eb rollup

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2015
It was determined that no leaks were unsafe, make the language reference clear about this.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2015
@bors bors merged commit 33118eb into rust-lang:master Jun 9, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants