Skip to content

1.7 release notes #31099

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 30, 2016
Merged

1.7 release notes #31099

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 30, 2016

Conversation

brson
Copy link
Contributor

@brson brson commented Jan 22, 2016

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Jan 22, 2016

Please review @rust-lang/libs @rust-lang/lang @rust-lang/compiler

@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Jan 22, 2016

I'm not mentioning new unstable features like #[deprecated] or type ascription.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

Big +1 to doing this overall.

On Jan 21, 2016, 19:06 -0500, Brian Andersonnotifications@github.com, wrote:

I'm not mentioning new unstable features like#[deprecated]or type ascription.


Reply to this email directly orview it on GitHub(#31099 (comment)).

[`Vec::as_mut_slice`],
[`String::as_str`],
[`String::as_mut_str`],
`<[T]>::`[`clone_from_slice`],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this a good place for a note about new behavior in clone_from_slice? It should say that clone_from_slice now requires the two slices to be the same length (and panics otherwise).

@brson brson added the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Jan 22, 2016
@@ -1,3 +1,353 @@
Version 1.7.0 (2016-03-03)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be a good idea to make it more obvious this hasn't been released yet and that this is technically a draft?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a good idea, but I think I won't do it. It would require patching both the beta and master branches later.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

r=me once you feel this is good to go

[`collections::hash_set::HashSet::drain`],
[`collections::binary_heap::Drain`],
[`collections::binary_heap::BinaryHeap::drain`],
[`Vec::extend_from_slice`] (renamed from `push_all`),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need a [] after the ] here.

@brson
Copy link
Contributor Author

brson commented Jan 29, 2016

@bors r=alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 29, 2016

📌 Commit 6dbff05 has been approved by alexcrichton

[`i32::overflowing_shl`],
[`i32::overflowing_shr`],
[`u32::checked_rem`],
[`u32::checked_neg`],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is missing a url

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 29, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 6dbff05 with merge 24cd6a3...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 29, 2016

⛄ The build was interrupted to prioritize another pull request.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: rollup

Sorry I interrupted to see if I can get the LLVM upgrade to land or otherwise the bots are just gonna keep oscillating back and forth between various versions of LLVM. It may not work out though...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 30, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 6dbff05 with merge 43ee048...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 30, 2016

💔 Test failed - auto-linux-cross-opt

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: retry

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 9:23 PM, bors notifications@github.com wrote:

[image: 💔] Test failed - auto-linux-cross-opt
http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-linux-cross-opt/builds/1070


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#31099 (comment).

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2016
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2016
@bors bors merged commit 6dbff05 into rust-lang:master Jan 30, 2016
@brson brson added the beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Feb 26, 2016
@brson brson mentioned this pull request Feb 26, 2016
@alexcrichton alexcrichton removed the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Feb 26, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants