-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update E0010 to use the new format #35439
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @pnkfelix (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
Great! Next make sure you also update the unit test so that you're testing to make sure that new label is there. |
Ah, yes. Thanks for reminding me about that. I'll also revert the message to the recommended message from #35194. It seems like I riff'd here. |
It looks like like the existing test is only matching on the string
And I've changed the inline message to match the top line message, which is what the request actually asked for:
|
There are some quirks in the test runner. I talk about them in the "Extra credit" section of the blog post. You'll need to add at least one NOTE to the test for it to start checking that the label is there. Once you add that NOTE, you can know that it's at least being tested. With that, I think we'll be good to go. Btw, thanks for fixing my grammar :) |
OK, looks like I skimmed that part when I focused on the tips section below. I'm looking into adding a NOTE now. |
Tested a bogus NOTE and then this NOTE and it looks as though it's now working as expected. |
Great. Can you squash your three 3 commits down to 1 commit? With that I think we'll be ready. |
0a4bf92
to
dfb66c3
Compare
Rebased. |
Great! @bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit dfb66c3 has been approved by |
…onathandturner Update E0010 to use the new format For rust-lang#35194
For #35194