Sustitutes try! for ? in the Result documentation #39756
Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @sfackler (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
|
@bors: r+ rollup thank you! |
|
📌 Commit 6b5c5f2 has been approved by |
| //! | ||
| //! [`expect`]: enum.Result.html#method.expect | ||
| //! [`Write`]: ../../std/io/trait.Write.html | ||
| //! [`write_all`]: ../../std/io/trait.Write.html#method.write_all | ||
| //! [`io::Result`]: ../../std/io/type.Result.html | ||
| //! [`try!`]: ../../std/macro.try.html | ||
| //! [`?`]: ../../std/macro.try.html |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should probably be changed to point to documentation for ? rather than the try macro.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the try doc explains about ? and it being the preferred way, I am not sure if there is a document for ?.
…r=steveklabnik Sustitutes try! for ? in the Result documentation Hopefully newcomers will go strait to use `?`
Hopefully newcomers will go strait to use
?