Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify RefCell minimum_spanning_tree example #61029

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2019

Conversation

blkerby
Copy link
Contributor

@blkerby blkerby commented May 22, 2019

This simplifies the implementation of the minimum_spanning_tree example of RefCell in the cell module-level docs, avoiding an unnecessary recursive call. This also eliminates the need for a block to contain the scope of the borrow in this example. But since that use of a block served an important didactic purpose, we make up for this by instead introducing a block in the initial, simpler example of RefCell, where the point will hopefully be conveyed to the reader more easily.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • These commits modify submodules.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 22, 2019
@blkerby
Copy link
Contributor Author

blkerby commented May 22, 2019

Warning

  • These commits modify submodules.

Sorry about that, didn't mean to add those. I force-pushed now to remove the submodule changes.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 22, 2019

📌 Commit e641fb4 has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 22, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2019
…excrichton

Simplify RefCell minimum_spanning_tree example

This simplifies the implementation of the `minimum_spanning_tree` example of `RefCell` in the `cell` module-level docs, avoiding an unnecessary recursive call. This also eliminates the need for a block to contain the scope of the borrow in this example. But since that use of a block served an important didactic purpose, we make up for this by instead introducing a block in the initial, simpler example of `RefCell`, where the point will hopefully be conveyed to the reader more easily.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2019
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #60300 (Allow null-pointer-optimized enums in FFI if their underlying representation is FFI safe)
 - #60773 (Always try to project predicates when finding auto traits in rustdoc)
 - #60809 (Add FAQ for NLL migration)
 - #61023 (Migrate from recursion to iterate on qualify consts visitor impl)
 - #61029 (Simplify RefCell minimum_spanning_tree example)
 - #61030 (Make maybe_codegen_consume_direct iterate instead of doing recursion)
 - #61034 (rustc_metadata: parametrize schema::CrateRoot by 'tcx and rip out old unused incremental infra.)
 - #61037 (Update clippy submodule)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit e641fb4 into rust-lang:master May 23, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants