-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggest using as_ref
on *const T
#61444
Conversation
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit eb73b73 has been approved by |
…jasper Suggest using `as_ref` on `*const T` Fix rust-lang#21596.
…jasper Suggest using `as_ref` on `*const T` Fix rust-lang#21596.
…jasper Suggest using `as_ref` on `*const T` Fix rust-lang#21596.
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - #61135 (Fix documentation of `Rc::make_mut` regarding `rc::Weak`.) - #61404 (miri unsizing: fix projecting into a field of an operand) - #61409 (Fix an ICE with a const argument in a trait) - #61413 (Re-implement async fn drop order lowering ) - #61419 (Add an unusual-conversion example to to_uppercase) - #61420 (Succinctify splice docs) - #61444 (Suggest using `as_ref` on `*const T`) - #61446 (On TerminatorKind::DropAndReplace still handle unused_mut correctly) - #61485 (azure: retry s3 upload if it fails) - #61489 (ci: Reenable step timings on AppVeyor) - #61496 (Do not panic in tidy on unbalanced parentheses in cfg's) - #61497 (Treat 0 as special value for codegen-units-std) - #61499 (Add regression test for existential type ICE #53457) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Might be a good place to mention that this is UB if the pointer is dangling, unaligned or does not point to initialized memory -- even if the result reference is never used? |
@RalfJung sounds reasonable. Can you file a follow up ticket? |
I was thinking maybe adding that to the I have adding it to the docs on my list. |
I think minimizing the requirement of having the docs open is a good thing. Basically anything I would tell someone when pair programming should be in the diagnostic itself, and this would count. I feel the diagnostics are part of the documentation, and the clarification should certainly be in the proper docs as well. |
Issue opened at #61786. |
Fix #21596.