Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove painful test that is not pulling its weight #65321

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2019

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Research suggests that we are not properly testing this case anyway, and
even if we were, it is unlikely that we will regress here -- or, perhaps
more accurately, if we do, I am uncertain that we care too much. It
definitely seems like an edge case, and one that is particularly
unlikely to occur as time goes on.

Fixes #63520

Research suggests that we are not properly testing this case anyway, and
even if we were, it is unlikely that we will regress here -- or, perhaps
more accurately, if we do, I am uncertain that we care too much. It
definitely seems like an edge case, and one that is particularly
unlikely to occur as time goes on.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 11, 2019
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 11, 2019

📌 Commit 000fe63 has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 11, 2019
tmandry added a commit to tmandry/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2019
…f8-test, r=nikomatsakis

Remove painful test that is not pulling its weight

Research suggests that we are not properly testing this case anyway, and
even if we were, it is unlikely that we will regress here -- or, perhaps
more accurately, if we do, I am uncertain that we care too much. It
definitely seems like an edge case, and one that is particularly
unlikely to occur as time goes on.

Fixes rust-lang#63520
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2019
Rollup of 15 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #64337 (libstd: Fix typos in doc)
 - #64986 (Function pointers as const generic arguments)
 - #65048 (Added doc about behavior of extend on HashMap)
 - #65191 (Add some regression tests)
 - #65200 (Add ?Sized bound to a supertrait listing in E0038 error documentation)
 - #65205 (Add long error explanation for E0568)
 - #65220 (Update LLVM for Emscripten exception handling support)
 - #65263 (Deduplicate is_{freeze,copy,sized}_raw)
 - #65266 (Mark Path::join as must_use)
 - #65276 (Don't cc rust-lang/compiler for toolstate changes)
 - #65277 (Query generator kind for error reporting)
 - #65283 (stability: Do not use `buffer_lint` after lowering to HIR)
 - #65289 (Fix suggested bound addition diagnostic)
 - #65310 (deriving: avoid dummy Span on an artificial `type_ident` path)
 - #65321 (Remove painful test that is not pulling its weight)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 000fe63 into rust-lang:master Oct 12, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

run-make-fulldeps/linker-output-non-utf8 failure
4 participants