-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove unneeded ref
from docs
#65600
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Will reduce confusion like in https://users.rust-lang.org/t/help-understanding-the-ref-t-syntax/33779 since match ergonomics means you (almost) never have to say `ref` anymore!
r? @KodrAus (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
📌 Commit 4ea1a19 has been approved by |
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2019
Remove unneeded `ref` from docs Will reduce confusion like in https://users.rust-lang.org/t/help-understanding-the-ref-t-syntax/33779 since match ergonomics means you (almost) never have to say `ref` anymore! There might be more like this, but I don't have a checkout on my computer right this second and I'm on slow wifi and GitHub search isn't powerful enough and that's my story.
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2019
Remove unneeded `ref` from docs Will reduce confusion like in https://users.rust-lang.org/t/help-understanding-the-ref-t-syntax/33779 since match ergonomics means you (almost) never have to say `ref` anymore! There might be more like this, but I don't have a checkout on my computer right this second and I'm on slow wifi and GitHub search isn't powerful enough and that's my story.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2019
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #64996 (Inline `ptr::null(_mut)` even in debug builds) - #65551 (Avoid realloc in `CString::new`) - #65593 (add test for calling non-const fn) - #65595 (move `parse_cfgspecs` to `rustc_interface`) - #65600 (Remove unneeded `ref` from docs) - #65602 (Fix plural mistake in emitter.rs) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Will reduce confusion like in https://users.rust-lang.org/t/help-understanding-the-ref-t-syntax/33779 since match ergonomics means you (almost) never have to say
ref
anymore!There might be more like this, but I don't have a checkout on my computer right this second and I'm on slow wifi and GitHub search isn't powerful enough and that's my story.