Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use LLVMDisposePassManager instead of raw delete in rustllvm #66761

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2019

Conversation

yuyoyuppe
Copy link
Contributor

LLVM has a dedicated API call which wraps the destructor invocation for the PassManager.
Rust invokes it otherwhere, but not in the LLVMRustWriteOutputFile.

Since LLVMDisposePassManager might be extended to perform additional cleanup actions in the future, this change replaces raw destructor invocation with that API call.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 25, 2019
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 26, 2019

📌 Commit e846ea1 has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 26, 2019
tmandry added a commit to tmandry/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2019
…excrichton

Use LLVMDisposePassManager instead of raw delete in rustllvm

LLVM has a dedicated API call which wraps the destructor invocation for the PassManager.
Rust invokes it [otherwhere](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d63b24ffcc48f44ef09e0369e6516d6f2dec3520/src/librustc_codegen_llvm/back/write.rs#L446-L447), but not in the `LLVMRustWriteOutputFile`.

Since `LLVMDisposePassManager` might be extended to perform additional cleanup actions in the future, this change replaces raw destructor invocation with that API call.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2019
Rollup of 17 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #64325 (Stabilize nested self receivers in 1.41.0)
 - #66222 (Use `eq_opaque_type_and_type` when type-checking closure signatures)
 - #66305 (Add by-value arrays to `improper_ctypes` lint)
 - #66399 (rustc_metadata: simplify the interactions between Lazy and Table.)
 - #66534 (Allow global references via ForeignItem and Item for the same symbol name during LLVM codegen)
 - #66700 (Fix pointing at arg for fulfillment errors in function calls)
 - #66704 (Intra doc enum variant field)
 - #66718 (Refactor `parse_enum_item` to use `parse_delim_comma_seq`)
 - #66722 (Handle non_exhaustive in borrow checking)
 - #66744 (Fix shrink_to panic documentation)
 - #66761 (Use LLVMDisposePassManager instead of raw delete in rustllvm)
 - #66769 (Add core::{f32,f64}::consts::TAU.)
 - #66774 (Clean up error codes)
 - #66777 (Put back tidy check on error codes)
 - #66797 (Fixes small typo in array docs r? @steveklabnik)
 - #66798 (Fix spelling typos)
 - #66800 (Combine similar tests for const match)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit e846ea1 into rust-lang:master Nov 28, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants