More Atomic types #6740
Closed
More Atomic types #6740
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2021
Teach SpanlessEq binding IDs changelog: Fix collapsible_match false positive Fixes rust-lang#6740 This PR changes the way `SpanlessEq` determines whether two local variables are the same. Instead of checking that the names match, it checks that the `HirId`s match. If local bindings are declared within the expressions that are being compared, `SpanlessEq` will remember bindings that correspond to each other in a `FxHashMap<HirId, HirId>`. This makes `SpanlessEq` more flexible while also fixing false positives. Example: `{ let x = 1; x + 2 }` is equal to `{ let y = 1; y + 2 }`. CC `@xFrednet` I think this will resolve some concerns in rust-lang#6463
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a follow up to #6732. Makes everything a little more sound.
r? @brson