Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix some tests failing in --pass check mode #72007

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2020

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 8, 2020
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

RalfJung commented May 8, 2020

Argh, we did it again, sorry... we should really have this on CI (Cc #69823)

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 8, 2020

📌 Commit 13c9312 has been approved by RalfJung

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 8, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 8, 2020
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#71989 (Use a single enum for the kind of a const context)
 - rust-lang#71993 (Remove old `util/liveness.rs` module)
 - rust-lang#71999 (Add myself to mailmap.)
 - rust-lang#72001 (Adjust cfg(version) to lang team decision)
 - rust-lang#72007 (Fix some tests failing in `--pass check` mode)
 - rust-lang#72008 (Add const-generics test)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit c4c6340 into rust-lang:master May 8, 2020
@petrochenkov petrochenkov deleted the passcheck3 branch February 22, 2025 18:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants