Rollup of 4 pull requests #72575
Merged
Rollup of 4 pull requests #72575
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fixes rust-lang#66898 When we are unable to resolve a reference to `self`, we current assume that the containing function doesn't have a `self` parameter, and emit an error message accordingly. However, if the reference to `self` was created by a macro invocation, then resolution will correctly fail, due to hygiene. In this case, we don't want to tell the user that the containing fuction doesn't have a 'self' paramter if it actually has one. This PR checks for the precense of a 'self' parameter, and adjusts the error message we emit accordingly. TODO: The exact error message we emit could probably be improved. Should we explicitly mention hygiene?
exhaustively check `ty::Kind` during structural match checking This was prone to errors as we may forget new kinds in the future. I am also not yet sure about some kinds. `ty::GeneratorWitness(..) | ty::Infer(_) | ty::Placeholder(_) | ty::UnnormalizedProjection(..) | ty::Bound(..)` might be unreachable here. We may want to forbid `ty::Projection`, similar to `ty::Param`. `ty::Opaque` seems fine afaict, should not be possible in a match atm. I believe `ty::Foreign` should not be structurally match, as I don't even know what that would actually mean. r? @pnkfelix cc @eddyb
…, r=matthewjasper Emit a better diagnostic when function actually has a 'self' parameter Fixes rust-lang#66898 When we are unable to resolve a reference to `self`, we current assume that the containing function doesn't have a `self` parameter, and emit an error message accordingly. However, if the reference to `self` was created by a macro invocation, then resolution will correctly fail, due to hygiene. In this case, we don't want to tell the user that the containing fuction doesn't have a 'self' paramter if it actually has one. This PR checks for the precense of a 'self' parameter, and adjusts the error message we emit accordingly. TODO: The exact error message we emit could probably be improved. Should we explicitly mention hygiene?
Enable `glacier` command via triagebot I noticed this was required by rust-lang#72554 (comment).
…an-DPC Clean up E0608 explanation r? @Dylan-DPC
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=4 |
|
📌 Commit aa8d64b has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-azure |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
ty::Kindduring structural match checking #72153 (exhaustively checkty::Kindduring structural match checking)glaciercommand via triagebot #72560 (Enableglaciercommand via triagebot)Failed merges:
r? @ghost