-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 6 pull requests #72627
Merged
Merged
Rollup of 6 pull requests #72627
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This will print a diagnostic for crates which are mentioned as `--extern` arguments on the command line, but are never referenced from the source. This diagnostic is controlled by `-Wunused-crate-dependencies` or `#![warn(unused_crate_dependencies)]` and is "allow" by default. There are cases where certain crates need to be linked in but are not directly referenced - for example if they are providing symbols for C linkage. In this case the warning can be suppressed with `use needed_crate as _;`. Thanks to @petrochenkov for simplified core. Resolves issue rust-lang#57274
…file with other functions
add a lint against references to packed fields Creating a reference to an insufficiently aligned packed field is UB and should be disallowed, both inside and outside of `unsafe` blocks. However, currently there is no stable alternative (rust-lang#64490) so all we do right now is have a future incompatibility warning when doing this outside `unsafe` (rust-lang#46043). This adds an allow-by-default lint. @retep998 suggested this can help early adopters avoid issues. It also means we can then do a crater run where this is deny-by-default as suggested by @joshtriplett. I guess the main thing to bikeshed is the lint name. I am not particularly happy with "packed_references" as it sounds like the packed field has reference type. I chose this because it is similar to "safe_packed_borrows". What about "reference_to_packed" or "unaligned_reference" or so?
JS cleanup The goal here is just to improve the source code a bit. I recommend to review one commit at a time, otherwise it might not make much sense. :) The biggest commit is the second one: to prevent to have "global" variables declared in `main.js` (and thus prevent name conflict or overwriting), I moved such code into anonymous functions. r? @kinnison cc @rust-lang/rustdoc
Warn about unused crate deps Implements rust-lang#57274 by adding -Wunused-crate-dependencies. This will warn about any `--extern` option on the command line which isn't referenced by the crate source either via `use` or `extern crate`. Crates which are added for some side effect but are otherwise unreferenced - such as for symbols they define - the warning can be suppressed with `use somecrate as _;`. If a crate has multiple aliases (eg using `foo = { package = "bar" }` in `Cargo.toml`), then it will warn about each unused alias. This does not consider crate added by some other means than `--extern`, including the standard library. It also doesn't consider any crate without `add_prelude` set (though I'm not sure about this). Unfortunately this probably [does not yet work well with Cargo](rust-lang#57274 (comment)) as it will over-specify crates, causing spurious warnings. As a result, this lint is "allow" by default and must be explicitly enabled either via `#![warn(unused_crate_deps)]` or with `-Wunused-crate-deps`.
Use correct function for detecting `const fn` in unsafety checking Resolves rust-lang#72394.
…eled-block, r=davidtwco Allow unlabeled breaks from desugared `?` in labeled blocks `?` is desugared into a `break` targeting the innermost `try` scope in which it resides. The `break` however will not have a label. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/librustc_ast_lowering/expr.rs#L1560 Since the `target` of the `break` is known, the compiler should not complain about an unlabeled jump for `break`s desugared from `?`. Closes rust-lang#72483
Update books ## reference 7 commits in 892b928b565e35d25b6f9c47faee03b94bc41489..becdca9477c9eafa96a4eea5156fe7a2730d9dd2 2020-05-11 11:13:51 -0700 to 2020-05-21 21:08:02 +0100 - Update tuple index token. (rust-lang/reference#814) - Fixes minor errors (rust-lang/reference#818) - Update that macros can be deprecated. (rust-lang/reference#813) - work on char/str descriptions (rust-lang/reference#809) - cfg_attr needs a valid predicate (rust-lang/reference#812) - Account for removal of UB in float-to-int casts (rust-lang/reference#810) - Fix stray plus signs. (rust-lang/reference#811) ## book 6 commits in 6247be15a7f7509559f7981ee2209b9e0cc121df..e8a4714a9d8a6136a59b8e63544e149683876e36 2020-05-03 10:55:09 -0500 to 2020-05-25 10:29:27 -0500 - code is 1024 now, not 512 - Clean up install a bit - We don't need build.sh anymore - Fix CI status in README - Port to github actions (rust-lang/book#2337) - operating system -> allocator ## rust-by-example 5 commits in ab072b14393cbd9e8a1d1d75879bf51e27217bbb..7aa82129aa23e7e181efbeb8da03a2a897ef6afc 2020-05-09 08:46:39 -0300 to 2020-05-25 14:54:26 -0300 - Person of age 0 is alive (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1348) - Gramatical fix in std/rc.md (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1347) - Capture example should use String (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1331) - Fix empty bound examples (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1343) - Fix an inline comment in macros/repeat.md (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1344) ## edition-guide 1 commits in 49270740c7a4bff2763e6bc730b191d45b7d5167..0a8ab5046829733eb03df0738c4fafaa9b36b348 2020-05-11 08:50:29 -0500 to 2020-05-18 08:34:23 -0500 - Changes for Rust 1.32 & setup for edition-next (rust-lang/edition-guide#213) ## embedded-book 3 commits in 366c50a03bed928589771eba8a6f18e0c0c01d23..5555a97f04ad7974ac6fb8fb47c267c4274adf4a 2020-05-07 09:04:42 +0000 to 2020-05-25 18:00:51 +0000 - Remove reference to const-fn feature of cortex-m. Closes rust-embedded/book#242. (rust-embedded/book#243) - Spelling: Appplication -> Application (rust-embedded/book#241) - QEMU debugging updates (rust-embedded/book#239)
@bors r+ p=6 rollup=never |
📌 Commit e061c40 has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-azure |
This was referenced May 27, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors
This PR was explicitly merged by bors.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
const fn
in unsafety checking #72401 (Use correct function for detectingconst fn
in unsafety checking)?
in labeled blocks #72581 (Allow unlabeled breaks from desugared?
in labeled blocks)Failed merges:
r? @ghost