Fix -Z unpretty=everybody_loops #73523
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
It turns out that this has not been working for who knows how long.
Previously:
```
pub fn h() { 1 + 2; }
```
After this change:
```
pub fn h() { loop {} }
```
This only affected the pass when run with the command line
pretty-printing option, so rustdoc was still replacing bodies with
`loop {}`.
|
It looks like @ecstatic-morse already had this as part of #73103, so |
This was referenced Jun 20, 2020
|
I don't think cherry-picking someone's commit and then having them review it is following the spirit of the rules, but sure. @bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 95f8daa has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
In my defense, it was convergent evolution, I only found that you wrote it originally afterwards 😆 |
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 23, 2020
…morse
Fix -Z unpretty=everybody_loops
It turns out that this has not been working for who knows how long.
Previously:
```
pub fn h() { 1 + 2; }
```
After this change:
```
pub fn h() { loop { } }
```
This only affected the pass when run with the command line
pretty-printing option, so rustdoc was still replacing bodies with
`loop {}`.
Manishearth
added a commit
to Manishearth/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 23, 2020
…morse
Fix -Z unpretty=everybody_loops
It turns out that this has not been working for who knows how long.
Previously:
```
pub fn h() { 1 + 2; }
```
After this change:
```
pub fn h() { loop { } }
```
This only affected the pass when run with the command line
pretty-printing option, so rustdoc was still replacing bodies with
`loop {}`.
This was referenced Jun 23, 2020
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 23, 2020
…arth Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#72780 (Enforce doc alias check) - rust-lang#72876 (Mention that BTreeMap::new() doesn't allocate) - rust-lang#73244 (Check for assignments between non-conflicting generator saved locals) - rust-lang#73488 (code coverage foundation for hash and num_counters) - rust-lang#73523 (Fix -Z unpretty=everybody_loops) - rust-lang#73587 (Move remaining `NodeId` APIs from `Definitions` to `Resolver`) - rust-lang#73601 (Point at the call span when overflow occurs during monomorphization) - rust-lang#73613 (The const propagator cannot trace references.) - rust-lang#73614 (fix `intrinsics::needs_drop` docs) - rust-lang#73630 (Provide context on E0308 involving fn items) - rust-lang#73665 (rustc: Modernize wasm checks for atomics) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It turns out that this has not been working for who knows how long.
Previously:
After this change:
This only affected the pass when run with the command line
pretty-printing option, so rustdoc was still replacing bodies with
loop {}.