This allows us to write

fn char_to_string() -> String {
    'a'.into()
}

which was not possible before.

Fixed grammar and sentence structure on appropriate instances.

I know very little about rust, so I saw this example and tried to generalize it by writing,
```
    let layout = Layout::new::<T>();
    let new_obj = unsafe {
        let ptr = alloc(layout) as *mut T;
        *ptr = obj;
        Box::from_raw(ptr)
    };
```
for some more complicated `T`, which ended up crashing with SIGSEGV,
because it tried to `drop_in_place` the previous object in `ptr` which is
of course garbage. I also added a comment that explains why `.write`
is used, but I think adding that comment is optional and may be too verbose
here. I do however think that changing this example is a good idea to
suggest the correct generalization. `.write` is also used in most of the rest
of the documentation here, even if the example is `i32`, so it would additionally
be more consistent.

Co-authored-by: Niko Matsakis <niko@alum.mit.edu>

Linked the logo/svg to https://www.rust-lang.org/
(change if required)

Added responsiveness to image logo based on device width (set at 90% of device width, which can be changed as per requirement)

update master

They are gated by internal feature gate const_likely

Co-authored-by: Oliver Scherer <github35764891676564198441@oli-obk.de>

Fixes rust-lang#67765

When reporting errors during MIR region inference, we sometimes use
`universal_upper_bound` to obtain a named universal region that we
can display to the user. However, this is not always possible - in a
case like `fn foo<'a, 'b>() { .. }`, the only upper bound for a region
containing `'a` and `'b` is `'static`. When displaying diagnostics, it's
usually better to display *some* named region (even if there are
multiple involved) rather than fall back to a generic error involving
`'static`.

This commit adds a new `approx_universal_upper_bound` method, which
uses the lowest-numbered universal region if the only alternative is to
return `'static`.

…xamples

Fix missing punctuation

Made the following changes throughout the IP address parser:
- Replaced all uses of `is_some()` / `is_none()` with `?`.
- "Upgraded" loops wherever possible; ie, replace `while` with `for`, etc.
    - Removed all cases of manual index tracking / incrementing.
- Renamed several single-character variables with more expressive names.
- Replaced several manual control flow segments with equivalent adapters (such as `Option::filter`).
- Removed `read_seq_3`; replaced with simple sequences of `?`.
- Parser now reslices its state when consuming, rather than carrying a separate state and index variable.
- `read_digit` now uses `char::to_digit`.
- Removed unnecessary casts back and forth between u8 and u32
- Added comments throughout, especially in the complex IPv6 parsing logic.
- Added comprehensive local unit tests for the parser to validate these changes.

Does not yet make its constness stable, though. Use of
`Location::caller` in const contexts is still gated by
`#![feature(const_caller_location)]`.

…=davidtwco

Added detailed error code explanation for issue E0687 in Rust compiler.

Added proper error explanation for issue E0687 in the Rust compiler.
Error Code E0687

Sub Part of Issue rust-lang#61137

r? @GuillaumeGomez

Bring net/parser.rs up to modern up to date with modern rust patterns

The current implementation of IP address parsing is very unidiomatic; it's full of `if` / `return` / `is_some` / `is_none` instead of `?`, `loop` with manual index tracking; etc. Went through and did and cleanup to try to bring it in line with modern sensibilities.

The obvious concern with making changes like this is "make sure you understand why it's written that way before changing it". Looking through the commit history for this file, there are several much smaller commits that make similar changes (For instance, rust-lang@3024c14, rust-lang@4f3ab49, rust-lang@79f8764), and there don't seem to be any commits in the history that indicate that this lack of idiomaticity is related to specific performance needs (ie, there aren't any commits that replace a `for` loop with a `loop` and a manual index count). In fact, the basic shape of the file is essentially unchanged from its initial commit back in 2015.

Made the following changes throughout the IP address parser:
- Replaced all uses of `is_some()` / `is_none()` with `?`.
- "Upgraded" loops wherever possible; ie, replace `while` with `for`, etc.
    - Removed all cases of manual index tracking / incrementing.
- Renamed several single-character variables with more expressive names.
- Replaced several manual control flow segments with equivalent adapters (such as `Option::filter`).
- Removed `read_seq_3`; replaced with simple sequences of `?`.
- Parser now reslices its state when consuming, rather than carrying a separate state and index variable.
- `read_digit` now uses `char::to_digit`.
- Added comments throughout, especially in the complex IPv6 parsing logic.
- Added comprehensive local unit tests for the parser to validate these changes.

Stabilize `#[track_caller]`.

# Stabilization Report

RFC: [2091]
Tracking issue: rust-lang#47809

## Summary

From the [rustc-dev-guide chapter][dev-guide]:

> Take this example program:

```rust
fn main() {
    let foo: Option<()> = None;
    foo.unwrap(); // this should produce a useful panic message!
}
```

> Prior to Rust 1.42, panics like this `unwrap()` printed a location in libcore:

```
$ rustc +1.41.0 example.rs; example.exe
thread 'main' panicked at 'called `Option::unwrap()` on a `None` value',...core\macros\mod.rs:15:40
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace.
```

> As of 1.42, we get a much more helpful message:

```
$ rustc +1.42.0 example.rs; example.exe
thread 'main' panicked at 'called `Option::unwrap()` on a `None` value', example.rs:3:5
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
```

> These error messages are achieved through a combination of changes to `panic!` internals to make use of `core::panic::Location::caller` and a number of `#[track_caller]` annotations in the standard library which propagate caller information.

The attribute adds an implicit caller location argument to the ABI of annotated functions, but does not affect the type or MIR of the function. We implement the feature entirely in codegen and in the const evaluator.

## Bottom Line

This PR stabilizes the use of `#[track_caller]` everywhere, including traits and extern blocks. It also stabilizes `core::panic::Location::caller`, although the use of that function in a const context remains gated by `#![feature(const_caller_location)]`.

The implementation for the feature already changed the output of panic messages for a number of std functions, as described in the [1.42 release announcement]. The attribute's use in `Index` and `IndexMut` traits is visible to users since 1.44.

## Tests

All of the tests for this feature live under [src/test/ui/rfc-2091-track-caller][tests] in the repo.

Noteworthy cases:

* [use of attr in std]
  * validates user-facing benefit of the feature
* [trait attribute inheritance]
  * covers subtle behavior designed during implementation and not RFC'd
* [const/codegen equivalence]
  * this was the result of a suspected edge case and investigation
* [diverging function support]
  * covers an unresolved question from the RFC
* [fn pointers and shims]
  * covers important potential sources of unsoundness

## Documentation

The rustc-dev-guide now has a chapter on [Implicit Caller Location][dev-guide].

I have an [open PR to the reference][attr-reference-pr] documenting the attribute.

The intrinsic's [wrapper] includes some examples as well.

## Implementation History

* 2019-10-02: [`#[track_caller]` feature gate (RFC 2091 1/N) rust-lang#65037](rust-lang#65037)
  * Picked up the patch that @ayosec had started on the feature gate.
* 2019-10-13: [Add `Instance::resolve_for_fn_ptr` (RFC 2091 rust-lang#2/N) rust-lang#65182](rust-lang#65182)
* 2019-10-20: ~~[WIP Add MIR argument for #[track_caller] (RFC 2091 3/N) rust-lang#65258](rust-lang#65258
  * Abandoned approach to send location as a MIR argument.
* 2019-10-28: [`std::panic::Location` is a lang_item, add `core::intrinsics::caller_location` (RFC 2091 3/N) rust-lang#65664](rust-lang#65664)
* 2019-12-07: [Implement #[track_caller] attribute. (RFC 2091 4/N) rust-lang#65881](rust-lang#65881)
* 2020-01-04: [libstd uses `core::panic::Location` where possible. rust-lang#67137](rust-lang#67137)
* 2020-01-08: [`Option::{expect,unwrap}` and `Result::{expect, expect_err, unwrap, unwrap_err}` have `#[track_caller]` rust-lang#67887](rust-lang#67887)
* 2020-01-20: [Fix #[track_caller] and function pointers rust-lang#68302](rust-lang#68302) (fixed rust-lang#68178)
* 2020-03-23: [#[track_caller] in traits rust-lang#69251](rust-lang#69251)
* 2020-03-24: [#[track_caller] on core::ops::{Index, IndexMut}. rust-lang#70234](rust-lang#70234)
* 2020-04-08 [Support `#[track_caller]` on functions in `extern "Rust" { ... }` rust-lang#70916](rust-lang#70916)

## Unresolveds

### From the RFC

> Currently the RFC simply prohibit applying #[track_caller] to trait methods as a future-proofing
> measure.

**Resolved.** See the dev-guide documentation and the tests section above.

> Diverging functions should be supported.

**Resolved.** See the tests section above.

> The closure foo::{{closure}} should inherit most attributes applied to the function foo, ...

**Resolved.** This unknown was related to specifics of the implementation which were made irrelevant by the final implementation.

### Binary Size

I [instrumented track_caller to use custom sections][measure-size] in a local build and discovered relatively minor binary size usage for the feature overall. I'm leaving the issue open to discuss whether we want to upstream custom section support.

There's an [open issue to discuss mitigation strategies][mitigate-size]. Some decisions remain about the "right" strategies to reduce size without overly constraining the compiler implementation. I'd be excited to see someone carry that work forward but my opinion is that we shouldn't block stabilization on implementing compiler flags for redaction.

### Specialization

There's an [open issue][specialization] on the semantics of the attribute in specialization chains. I'm inclined to move forward with stabilization without an exact resolution here given that specialization is itself unstable, but I also think it should be an easy question to resolve.

### Location only points to the start of a call span

rust-lang#69977 was resolved by rust-lang#73182, and the next step should probably be to [extend `Location` with a notion of the end of a call](rust-lang#73554).

### Regression of std's panic messages

rust-lang#70963 should be resolved by serializing span hygeine to crate metadata: rust-lang#68686.

[2091]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2091-inline-semantic.md
[dev-guide]: https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/codegen/implicit-caller-location.html
[specialization]: rust-lang#70293
[measure-size]: rust-lang#70579
[mitigate-size]: rust-lang#70580
[attr-reference-pr]: rust-lang/reference#742
[wrapper]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/core/panic/struct.Location.html#method.caller
[tests]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2091-track-caller
[const/codegen equivalence]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2091-track-caller/caller-location-fnptr-rt-ctfe-equiv.rs
[diverging function support]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2091-track-caller/diverging-caller-location.rs
[use of attr in std]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2091-track-caller/std-panic-locations.rs
[fn pointers and shims]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2091-track-caller/tracked-fn-ptr-with-arg.rs
[trait attribute inheritance]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2091-track-caller/tracked-trait-impls.rs
[1.42 release announcement]: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2020/03/12/Rust-1.42.html#useful-line-numbers-in-option-and-result-panic-messages

…olnay

impl From<char> for String

This allows us to write

````rust
fn char_to_string() -> String {
    'a'.into()
}
````

which was not possible before.

…static-morse

remove rustdoc warnings

Fix sentence structure

Fixed grammar and sentence structure on appropriate instances.

Update Box::from_raw example to generalize better

I know very little about rust, so I saw the example here
```
use std::alloc::{alloc, Layout};

unsafe {
    let ptr = alloc(Layout::new::<i32>()) as *mut i32;
    *ptr = 5;
    let x = Box::from_raw(ptr);
}
```
and tried to generalize it by writing,
```
    let layout = Layout::new::<T>();
    let new_obj = unsafe {
        let ptr = alloc(layout) as *mut T;
        *ptr = obj;
        Box::from_raw(ptr)
    };
```
for some more complicated `T`, which ended up crashing with SIGSEGV,
because it tried to `drop_in_place` the previous object in `ptr` which is
of course garbage. I think that changing this example to use `.write` instead
would be a good idea to suggest the correct generalization. It is also more
consistent with other documentation items in this file, which use `.write`.
I also added a comment to explain it, but I'm not too attached to that,
and can see it being too verbose in this place.

stop taking references in Relate

Adds a `Copy` bound to `Relate` and changes the type signatures to `T` from `&T`. While the `Copy` bound is not strictly necessary (i.e. the `Clone` bound of `TypeRelation` would be good enough), we don't need non `Copy` types and it simplifies the implementation.

Removes the afaict unused impls for `Vec<ty::PolyExistentialProjection<'tcx>>`, `Rc<T>` and `Box<T>`. If they end up being relevant again the bound of `Relate` can be reduced to `T: Clone`.

This also changes signature of `Binder::skip_binder` to `fn skip_binder(self) -> T`.

`TypeError::ProjectionBoundsLength` was never used and is also removed in this PR.

r? @nikomatsakis maybe 🤔 feel free to reassign

…sKalbertodt

Document the static keyword

Partial fix of rust-lang#34601.

This documents the `static` keyword. It's basically a simplified version of the reference with more examples.

@rustbot modify labels: T-doc,C-enhancement

…LukasKalbertodt

Remap Windows ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER to ErrorKind::InvalidInput from Other

I don't know if this is acceptable or how likely it is to break existing code, but it seem to me ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER "The parameter is incorrect" should map to ErrorKind::InvalidInput "A parameter was incorrect". Previously this value fell through to ErrorKind::Other.

I can't speak for anyone but myself, but I instinctively thought it would be InvalidInput.

…ywiser

Move terminator to new module

Moves terminator types from `librustc_middle/mir/mod.rs` into submodule
Fixes rust-lang#73723

Make `likely` and `unlikely` const, gated by feature `const_unlikely`

This PR also contains a fix to allow `#[allow_internal_unstable]` to work properly with `#[rustc_const_unstable]`.

cc @RalfJung @nagisa

r? @oli-obk

Document the type keyword

Partial fix of rust-lang#34601.

Two small examples, one clarifying that `type` only defines an alias, not a completely new type, the other explaining the use in traits.

@rustbot modify labels: T-doc,C-enhancement

…upper, r=estebank

Use an 'approximate' universal upper bound when reporting region errors

Fixes rust-lang#67765

When reporting errors during MIR region inference, we sometimes use
`universal_upper_bound` to obtain a named universal region that we
can display to the user. However, this is not always possible - in a
case like `fn foo<'a, 'b>() { .. }`, the only upper bound for a region
containing `'a` and `'b` is `'static`. When displaying diagnostics, it's
usually better to display *some* named region (even if there are
multiple involved) rather than fall back to a generic error involving
`'static`.

This commit adds a new `approx_universal_upper_bound` method, which
uses the lowest-numbered universal region if the only alternative is to
return `'static`.

…bank

Fix wording for anonymous parameter name help

```
 --> exercises/functions/functions2.rs:8:15
  |
8 | fn call_me(num) {
  |               ^ expected one of `:`, `@`, or `|`
  |
  = note: anonymous parameters are removed in the 2018 edition (see RFC 1685)
help: if this is a `self` type, give it a parameter name
  |
8 | fn call_me(self: num) {
  |            ^^^^^^^^^
help: if this was a parameter name, give it a type
  |
8 | fn call_me(num: TypeName) {
  |            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: if this is a type, explicitly ignore the parameter name
  |
8 | fn call_me(_: num) {
  |
```
This commit changes "if this was a parameter name" to "if this is a parameter name" to match the wording of similar errors.

…iplett

Fix comma in debug_assert! docs

…thewjasper

Edit cursor.prev() method docs in lexer

Fix missing punctuation