more tiny clippy cleanups #77037
more tiny clippy cleanups #77037
Conversation
|
r? @oli-obk (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
r? @Dylan-DPC ui tests need to be updated (missing a --bless i guess :P ) |
matthiaskrgr
force-pushed
the
cl42ppy
branch
from
26eb3f8 to
5ed5ad9
Compare
| @@ -77,9 +77,9 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> { | |||
| let res = match bin_op { | |||
| Eq => l == r, | |||
| Ne => l != r, | |||
| Lt => l < r, | |||
| Lt => !l & r, // equals l < r | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't there be an allow here instead of the new code?
-
regardless whether you think whether
l < ris clearer than!l & ror not, this specific piece of code concerns the implementation ofl < rin the constant evaluator. I think it's most clear to implementl < rvial < rinstead via something that clippy thinks is better. -
If
l < rshould be replaced with not and and operations, why notl <= ras well?
The bool comparison lint description in clippy's docs makes sense, x < true is code smell. But x < y in an implementation of x < y is IMO not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Alright, I removed changes from the pr.
Sprinkling the rustc code with clippy allow attributes is probably something most people would object though.
matthiaskrgr
force-pushed
the
cl42ppy
branch
from
5ed5ad9 to
7fc3699
Compare
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 7fc36998fc7d53e444de570764196eacb2594769 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #77102) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels: |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
…y::useless_conversion)
…t()) (clippy::mem_replace_with_default)
matthiaskrgr
force-pushed
the
cl42ppy
branch
from
7fc3699 to
d7a5c57
Compare
|
@rustbot modify labels: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-author |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit d7a5c57 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
more tiny clippy cleanups commits stand alone and can be reviewed one by one
…as-schievink Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#77037 (more tiny clippy cleanups) - rust-lang#77233 (BTreeMap: keep an eye out on the size of the main components) - rust-lang#77280 (Ensure that all LLVM components requested by tests are available on CI) - rust-lang#77284 (library: Forward compiler-builtins "mem" feature) - rust-lang#77296 (liveness: Use Option::None to represent absent live nodes) - rust-lang#77322 (Add unstable book docs for `-Zunsound-mir-opts`) - rust-lang#77328 (Use `rtassert!` instead of `assert!` from the child process after fork() in std::sys::unix::process::Command::spawn()) - rust-lang#77331 (Add test for async/await combined with const-generics.) - rust-lang#77338 (Fix typo in alloc vec comment) - rust-lang#77340 (Alloc vec use imported path) - rust-lang#77345 (Add test for issue rust-lang#74761) - rust-lang#77348 (Update books) Failed merges: r? `@ghost`
commits stand alone and can be reviewed one by one