-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Unsupported
to std::io::ErrorKind
#78880
Conversation
r? @shepmaster (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
cc @rust-lang/libs explicitly for this -- this might need to go in insta-stable, since while the variant can be marked unstable, the change to stop emitting the previous one would not be feature-gated. |
Should |
I updated
I didn't include errors like The implementation for unsupported targets is currently: pub fn decode_error_kind(_code: i32) -> crate::io::ErrorKind {
crate::io::ErrorKind::Other
} which still seems fine to me. |
The documentation fortunately already notes that these kind of changes might happen in the future:
(In hindsight it might have been better if matching 'other' errors against I'm not sure if adding an
Feel free to ignore CloudABI, as that platform itself will be NOTSUP soon: #78439 |
I can see the value in wanting to check whether or not an IO operation is supported so you can fallback to alternatives. I also think we should consider marking this as insta-stable if we want to add it. In either case I think an FCP would probably be a good idea before we land it. |
178a527
to
90d22bc
Compare
I have updated the PR to immediately stabilize |
r? @KodrAus |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
90d22bc
to
1918e9a
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
1918e9a
to
dd62689
Compare
@rfcbot fcp merge This proposes adding a |
Team member @KodrAus has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members: Concerns:
Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up! See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me. |
Rebased and fixed the clippy error, should be ready to try merging again. |
@bors r=joshtriplett |
📌 Commit 5b5afae has been approved by |
Add `Unsupported` to `std::io::ErrorKind` I noticed a significant portion of the uses of `ErrorKind::Other` in std is for unsupported operations. The notion that a specific operation is not available on a target (and will thus never succeed) seems semantically distinct enough from just "an unspecified error occurred", which is why I am proposing to add the variant `Unsupported` to `std::io::ErrorKind`. **Implementation**: The following variant will be added to `std::io::ErrorKind`: ```rust /// This operation is unsupported on this platform. Unsupported ``` `std::io::ErrorKind::Unsupported` is an error returned when a given operation is not supported on a platform, and will thus never succeed; there is no way for the software to recover. It will be used instead of `Other` where appropriate, e.g. on wasm for file and network operations. `decode_error_kind` will be updated to decode operating system errors to `Unsupported`: - Unix and VxWorks: `libc::ENOSYS` - Windows: `c::ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED` - WASI: `wasi::ERRNO_NOSYS` **Stability**: This changes the kind of error returned by some functions on some platforms, which I think is not covered by the stability guarantees of the std? User code could depend on this behavior, expecting `ErrorKind::Other`, however the docs already mention: > Errors that are `Other` now may move to a different or a new `ErrorKind` variant in the future. It is not recommended to match an error against `Other` and to expect any additional characteristics, e.g., a specific `Error::raw_os_error` return value. The most recent variant added to `ErrorKind` was `UnexpectedEof` in `1.6.0` (almost 5 years ago), but `ErrorKind` is marked as `#[non_exhaustive]` and the docs warn about exhaustively matching on it, so adding a new variant per se should not be a breaking change. The variant `Unsupported` itself could be marked as `#[unstable]`, however, because this PR also immediately uses this new variant and changes the errors returned by functions I'm inclined to agree with the others in this thread that the variant should be insta-stabilized.
Add `Unsupported` to `std::io::ErrorKind` I noticed a significant portion of the uses of `ErrorKind::Other` in std is for unsupported operations. The notion that a specific operation is not available on a target (and will thus never succeed) seems semantically distinct enough from just "an unspecified error occurred", which is why I am proposing to add the variant `Unsupported` to `std::io::ErrorKind`. **Implementation**: The following variant will be added to `std::io::ErrorKind`: ```rust /// This operation is unsupported on this platform. Unsupported ``` `std::io::ErrorKind::Unsupported` is an error returned when a given operation is not supported on a platform, and will thus never succeed; there is no way for the software to recover. It will be used instead of `Other` where appropriate, e.g. on wasm for file and network operations. `decode_error_kind` will be updated to decode operating system errors to `Unsupported`: - Unix and VxWorks: `libc::ENOSYS` - Windows: `c::ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED` - WASI: `wasi::ERRNO_NOSYS` **Stability**: This changes the kind of error returned by some functions on some platforms, which I think is not covered by the stability guarantees of the std? User code could depend on this behavior, expecting `ErrorKind::Other`, however the docs already mention: > Errors that are `Other` now may move to a different or a new `ErrorKind` variant in the future. It is not recommended to match an error against `Other` and to expect any additional characteristics, e.g., a specific `Error::raw_os_error` return value. The most recent variant added to `ErrorKind` was `UnexpectedEof` in `1.6.0` (almost 5 years ago), but `ErrorKind` is marked as `#[non_exhaustive]` and the docs warn about exhaustively matching on it, so adding a new variant per se should not be a breaking change. The variant `Unsupported` itself could be marked as `#[unstable]`, however, because this PR also immediately uses this new variant and changes the errors returned by functions I'm inclined to agree with the others in this thread that the variant should be insta-stabilized.
⌛ Testing commit 5b5afae with merge 0052f444a7935147d31baa80099dbdfb1140255d... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
@bors retry |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Add `Unsupported` to `std::io::ErrorKind` I noticed a significant portion of the uses of `ErrorKind::Other` in std is for unsupported operations. The notion that a specific operation is not available on a target (and will thus never succeed) seems semantically distinct enough from just "an unspecified error occurred", which is why I am proposing to add the variant `Unsupported` to `std::io::ErrorKind`. **Implementation**: The following variant will be added to `std::io::ErrorKind`: ```rust /// This operation is unsupported on this platform. Unsupported ``` `std::io::ErrorKind::Unsupported` is an error returned when a given operation is not supported on a platform, and will thus never succeed; there is no way for the software to recover. It will be used instead of `Other` where appropriate, e.g. on wasm for file and network operations. `decode_error_kind` will be updated to decode operating system errors to `Unsupported`: - Unix and VxWorks: `libc::ENOSYS` - Windows: `c::ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED` - WASI: `wasi::ERRNO_NOSYS` **Stability**: This changes the kind of error returned by some functions on some platforms, which I think is not covered by the stability guarantees of the std? User code could depend on this behavior, expecting `ErrorKind::Other`, however the docs already mention: > Errors that are `Other` now may move to a different or a new `ErrorKind` variant in the future. It is not recommended to match an error against `Other` and to expect any additional characteristics, e.g., a specific `Error::raw_os_error` return value. The most recent variant added to `ErrorKind` was `UnexpectedEof` in `1.6.0` (almost 5 years ago), but `ErrorKind` is marked as `#[non_exhaustive]` and the docs warn about exhaustively matching on it, so adding a new variant per se should not be a breaking change. The variant `Unsupported` itself could be marked as `#[unstable]`, however, because this PR also immediately uses this new variant and changes the errors returned by functions I'm inclined to agree with the others in this thread that the variant should be insta-stabilized.
I noticed a significant portion of the uses of
ErrorKind::Other
in std is for unsupported operations.The notion that a specific operation is not available on a target (and will thus never succeed) seems semantically distinct enough from just "an unspecified error occurred", which is why I am proposing to add the variant
Unsupported
tostd::io::ErrorKind
.Implementation:
The following variant will be added to
std::io::ErrorKind
:std::io::ErrorKind::Unsupported
is an error returned when a given operation is not supported on a platform, and will thus never succeed; there is no way for the software to recover. It will be used instead ofOther
where appropriate, e.g. on wasm for file and network operations.decode_error_kind
will be updated to decode operating system errors toUnsupported
:libc::ENOSYS
c::ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED
wasi::ERRNO_NOSYS
Stability:
This changes the kind of error returned by some functions on some platforms, which I think is not covered by the stability guarantees of the std? User code could depend on this behavior, expecting
ErrorKind::Other
, however the docs already mention:The most recent variant added to
ErrorKind
wasUnexpectedEof
in1.6.0
(almost 5 years ago), butErrorKind
is marked as#[non_exhaustive]
and the docs warn about exhaustively matching on it, so adding a new variant per se should not be a breaking change.The variant
Unsupported
itself could be marked as#[unstable]
, however, because this PR also immediately uses this new variant and changes the errors returned by functions I'm inclined to agree with the others in this thread that the variant should be insta-stabilized.