-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 4 pull requests #84303
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 4 pull requests #84303
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: Mara Bos <m-ou.se@m-ou.se>
Add `Unsupported` to `std::io::ErrorKind` I noticed a significant portion of the uses of `ErrorKind::Other` in std is for unsupported operations. The notion that a specific operation is not available on a target (and will thus never succeed) seems semantically distinct enough from just "an unspecified error occurred", which is why I am proposing to add the variant `Unsupported` to `std::io::ErrorKind`. **Implementation**: The following variant will be added to `std::io::ErrorKind`: ```rust /// This operation is unsupported on this platform. Unsupported ``` `std::io::ErrorKind::Unsupported` is an error returned when a given operation is not supported on a platform, and will thus never succeed; there is no way for the software to recover. It will be used instead of `Other` where appropriate, e.g. on wasm for file and network operations. `decode_error_kind` will be updated to decode operating system errors to `Unsupported`: - Unix and VxWorks: `libc::ENOSYS` - Windows: `c::ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED` - WASI: `wasi::ERRNO_NOSYS` **Stability**: This changes the kind of error returned by some functions on some platforms, which I think is not covered by the stability guarantees of the std? User code could depend on this behavior, expecting `ErrorKind::Other`, however the docs already mention: > Errors that are `Other` now may move to a different or a new `ErrorKind` variant in the future. It is not recommended to match an error against `Other` and to expect any additional characteristics, e.g., a specific `Error::raw_os_error` return value. The most recent variant added to `ErrorKind` was `UnexpectedEof` in `1.6.0` (almost 5 years ago), but `ErrorKind` is marked as `#[non_exhaustive]` and the docs warn about exhaustively matching on it, so adding a new variant per se should not be a breaking change. The variant `Unsupported` itself could be marked as `#[unstable]`, however, because this PR also immediately uses this new variant and changes the errors returned by functions I'm inclined to agree with the others in this thread that the variant should be insta-stabilized.
…llaumeGomez rustdoc: Reduce visual weight of attributes. Followup from rust-lang#83337. As part of that PR, we stopped hiding attributes behind a toggle, because most things have just zero or one attributes. However, this made clear that the current rendering of attributes emphasizes them a lot, which distracts from function signatures. This PR changes their color of attributes to be the same as the toggles, and reduces their font weight. This also removes `#[lang]` from the list of ALLOWED_ATTRIBUTES. This attribute is an implementation detail rather than part of the public-facing documentation. ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/220205/115131061-cc407d80-9fa9-11eb-9a77-ad3f3217f391.png) Demo at https://hoffman-andrews.com/rust/de-emph-attr/std/string/struct.String.html#method.trim
rustdoc: get rid of CURRENT_DEPTH Fixes rust-lang#82742
…vink Slightly change wording in doc comment and fix typo in vec/mod.rs Suggested by ``@pickfire`` in rust-lang#82760
@bors: r+ p=4 |
📌 Commit 9ef82b6 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
label
Apr 18, 2021
@bors rollup=never |
⌛ Testing commit 9ef82b6 with merge 915ebfcfb7ee685cdd94690e51c9caf2aa17b87e... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Apr 18, 2021
@bors: retry |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Apr 18, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Unsupported
tostd::io::ErrorKind
#78880 (AddUnsupported
tostd::io::ErrorKind
)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup