Skip to content

Add long explanation for E0547 #81836

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Add long explanation for E0547 #81836

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

jesusprubio
Copy link
Contributor

Helps with #61137

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Some changes occurred in diagnostic error codes

cc @GuillaumeGomez

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @lcnr

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 6, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors: r+ rollup squash

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 7, 2021

📌 Commit 3691878 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 7, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez mentioned this pull request Feb 7, 2021
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2021
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#81853 - GuillaumeGomez:rollup-xzh1z4v, r=Guil…
5a5f3a9 
…laumeGomez

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#81526 (btree: use Option's unwrap_unchecked())
 - rust-lang#81742 (Add a note about the correctness and the effect on unsafe code to the `ExactSizeIterator` docs)
 - rust-lang#81830 (Add long error explanation for E0542)
 - rust-lang#81835 (Improve long explanation for E0546)
 - rust-lang#81843 (Add regression test for rust-lang#29821)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#81836 (Add long explanation for E0547)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 7, 2021

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #81853) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 7, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Generally we use rebase instead of merge to fix conflicts. However, I don't know if it's a requirement or not...

pickfire
pickfire reviewed Feb 8, 2021
View reviewed changes
compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0547.md
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
The `issue` value is missing in a stability attribute.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would this be clearer if it is flipped? I wonder if the term is called "value"?

Suggested change
The `issue` value is missing in a stability attribute.
A stability attribute is missing `issue`.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Honestly, I can't see any benefit. Anyway, it's not a big deal for me :).

@GuillaumeGomez , what do you think?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I find the suggested one more difficult to understand.

@jesusprubio
Copy link
Contributor Author

Generally we use rebase instead of merge to fix conflicts. However, I don't know if it's a requirement or not...

My fault :), I'm starting a new PR and closing this one.

@jesusprubio
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing in favor of: #81925

@jesusprubio jesusprubio closed this Feb 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@pickfire pickfire pickfire left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements
Assignees

@lcnr lcnr

Labels
S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@jesusprubio @rust-highfive @GuillaumeGomez @bors @pickfire @lcnr