Skip to content

Conversation

Seppel3210
Copy link
Contributor

When searching for "reverse" in rustdoc you can't find the rev method on Iterator so here is a search alias for that.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @joshtriplett

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 13, 2021
Comment on lines 2739 to 2741
#[doc(alias = "reverse")]
#[inline]
#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]

This comment was marked as resolved.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't seen anything indicating length-sorting in any of the contribution documentation, and I also haven't seen examples of that in the compiler source. From what I can tell, order is generally (in order of importance):

  • Semantically significant ordering (if one attribute affects another)
  • Grouping related attributes (e.g. multiple stability-related attributes)
  • More-or-less alphabetical.

This ordering seems consistent with that, to me.

Is there some policy I'm unaware of?

Copy link
Member

@ibraheemdev ibraheemdev Mar 13, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@joshtriplett I don't think there is a policy, you would know better than me if there was :) I just thought it looked better and more consistent that way.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just looked one or two examples elsewhere and just did that but I can also change it to that I guess :)

Copy link
Member

@ibraheemdev ibraheemdev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

.

@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

r=me, after the formatting discussion is resolved one way or the other.

@Seppel3210
Copy link
Contributor Author

This should be fine now? @ibraheemdev

@Seppel3210
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r=joshtriplett

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 13, 2021

@Seppel3210: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: Not in reviewers

@Seppel3210
Copy link
Contributor Author

😔

@Seppel3210
Copy link
Contributor Author

@joshtriplett , @ibraheemdev could one of you approve that then 🙂

@ibraheemdev
Copy link
Member

I don't have sufficient privileges either.

@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 13, 2021

📌 Commit f201746 has been approved by joshtriplett

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 13, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2021
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#81465 (Add documentation about formatting `Duration` values)
 - rust-lang#82121 (Implement Extend and FromIterator for OsString)
 - rust-lang#82617 (Document `everybody_loops`)
 - rust-lang#82789 (Get with field index from pattern slice instead of directly indexing)
 - rust-lang#82798 (Rename `rustdoc` to `rustdoc::all`)
 - rust-lang#82804 (std: Fix a bug on the wasm32-wasi target opening files)
 - rust-lang#82943 (Demonstrate best practice for feeding stdin of a child processes)
 - rust-lang#83066 (Add `reverse` search alias for Iterator::rev())
 - rust-lang#83070 (Update cargo)
 - rust-lang#83081 (Fix panic message of `assert_failed_inner`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 54546a8 into rust-lang:master Mar 14, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.52.0 milestone Mar 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants